Biosimilar Development Considerations for Therapeutic Proteins With Limited Systemic Exposure: A Landscape Analysis and Pathway Evaluation

Biosimilar development for therapeutic proteins (TPs) with limited systemic exposure presents distinct challenges, as the new paradigm based on comparative analytical assessments plus pharmacokinetic similarity without a comparative efficacy study (CES) is inapplicable. Of 19 TPs with limited systemic exposure, 15 are well-characterized, of which 12 have at least one CES-feasible indication. The remaining 3 may require alternative strategies, including pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker approaches or optimized CES designs, underscoring the need for proactive regulatory engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.70543
Primary Topic
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biosimilar Development Considerations for Therapeutic Proteins With Limited Systemic Exposure: A Landscape Analysis and Pathway Evaluation

Anh‐Dung Le, Qin Sun, Po-Hung Hsieh, Yow‐Ming Wang et al.
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
article

Biosimilar Development Considerations for Therapeutic Proteins With Limited Systemic Exposure: A Landscape Analysis and Pathway Evaluation

Anh‐Dung Le, Qin Sun, Po-Hung Hsieh, Yow‐Ming Wang, Ting Wang, Jenny Zheng
article en

Abstract

Biosimilar development for therapeutic proteins (TPs) with limited systemic exposure presents distinct challenges, as the new paradigm based on comparative analytical assessments plus pharmacokinetic similarity without a comparative efficacy study (CES) is inapplicable. Of 19 TPs with limited systemic exposure, 15 are well-characterized, of which 12 have at least one CES-feasible indication. The remaining 3 may require alternative strategies, including pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarker approaches or optimized CES designs, underscoring the need for proactive regulatory engagement.

Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Biosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon