Influence of data processing decisions on ISO 25178 areal surface roughness parameters and their relevance to micro-Vickers hardness measurements

Abstract This study investigates how data-processing decisions influence ISO 25178 areal surface roughness parameters and examines which of those parameters most reliably characterise surfaces used in micro-Vickers hardness testing. Six processing variants — two form-removal polynomial degrees, two resampling densities, and two L-filter cut-off wavelengths — were applied independently to measurements of stainless steel and aluminium alloy surfaces prepared at three roughness levels (Sa = 0.014–0.42 µm). Parameter sensitivity to processing was found to depend strongly on surface roughness level, with smooth surfaces exhibiting deviations an order of magnitude larger than rough surfaces under identical processing changes. Among the processing variants examined, the L-filter cut-off wavelength was identified as the dominant source of parameter variation, followed by form-removal polynomial degree and resampling density. Sa, Sq, Sk, and Spk showed the strongest correlations with hardness values (r = 0.79–0.96), with Vmp providing supplementary correlation (r = 0.80–0.91). On smooth surfaces (Sa < 0.02 µm), no parameter remained within acceptable deviation bounds under any λc variation, identifying strict filter standardisation as an absolute requirement at this roughness level. Consistent documentation of processing methodology is essential for valid cross-study comparison of surface texture–hardness relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surface Topography Metrology and Properties
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2051-672x/aeba03
Primary Topic
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Influence of data processing decisions on ISO 25178 areal surface roughness parameters and their relevance to micro-Vickers hardness measurements

Ernests Jansons, Jānis Lungevičs, Irīna Boiko, Raimonds Sirants
2 links
Surface Topography Metrology and Properties
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
article

Influence of data processing decisions on ISO 25178 areal surface roughness parameters and their relevance to micro-Vickers hardness measurements

Ernests Jansons, Jānis Lungevičs, Irīna Boiko, Raimonds Sirants
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates how data-processing decisions influence ISO 25178 areal surface roughness parameters and examines which of those parameters most reliably characterise surfaces used in micro-Vickers hardness testing. Six processing variants — two form-removal polynomial degrees, two resampling densities, and two L-filter cut-off wavelengths — were applied independently to measurements of stainless steel and aluminium alloy surfaces prepared at three roughness levels (Sa = 0.014–0.42 µm). Parameter sensitivity to processing was found to depend strongly on surface roughness level, with smooth surfaces exhibiting deviations an order of magnitude larger than rough surfaces under identical processing changes. Among the processing variants examined, the L-filter cut-off wavelength was identified as the dominant source of parameter variation, followed by form-removal polynomial degree and resampling density. Sa, Sq, Sk, and Spk showed the strongest correlations with hardness values (r = 0.79–0.96), with Vmp providing supplementary correlation (r = 0.80–0.91). On smooth surfaces (Sa < 0.02 µm), no parameter remained within acceptable deviation bounds under any λc variation, identifying strict filter standardisation as an absolute requirement at this roughness level. Consistent documentation of processing methodology is essential for valid cross-study comparison of surface texture–hardness relationships.

Surface Topography Metrology and Properties
Riga Technical University (LV)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon