Comparative Effects of Modified Yogasana and Prop-Assisted Yogasana on Pain, Disability, and C-Reactive Protein in Adults with Mechanical Low Back Pain

Background: Chronic mechanical low back pain is associated with persistent pain, functional disability, and reduced participation in daily activities. Modified and prop-assisted Yogasana may provide different levels of active movement and external support, however, comparative evidence remains limited.Objective: To compare the effects of modified Yogasana and prop-assisted Yogasana on pain intensity, back-related disability, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in men with chronic mechanical low back pain.Methods: This non-randomized controlled study included 90 men aged 35–45 years who were assigned to a Modified Yogasana Group, Prop-Assisted Yogasana Group, or medication-only Control Group, with 30 participants in each group. Both Yogasana interventions were administered for 12 weeks, five sessions per week, for 60 minutes per session. Pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index scores, and serum CRP were assessed at pretest, mid-test, and post-test. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance and Scheffé’s post-hoc test, with significance established at p < 0.05.Results: Baseline pain and disability did not differ significantly among the groups. At post-test, pain scores were significantly lower in the Modified Yogasana Group (3.25 ± 0.71) and Prop-Assisted Yogasana Group (3.82 ± 0.89) than in the Control Group (7.07 ± 0.76, F = 205.10, p < 0.05). Modified Yogasana also produced a significantly lower pain score than prop-assisted Yogasana. Post-test disability scores were 23.96 ± 4.18, 26.09 ± 5.33, and 44.13 ± 4.56, respectively (F = 165.67, p < 0.05). Both Yogasana groups differed significantly from the Control Group, whereas the difference between the two Yogasana groups was not significant. Post-test CRP values were 3.09 ± 0.88, 4.38 ± 0.79, and 6.50 ± 1.05 mg/L, respectively (F = 106.49, p < 0.05). However, CRP differed significantly among the groups at baseline.Conclusion: Both modified and prop-assisted Yogasana were associated with reduced pain and disability compared with medication alone. Modified Yogasana produced a greater reduction in pain, while both interventions demonstrated comparable improvements in disability. The CRP findings require cautious interpretation and confirmation through baseline-adjusted analysis because of the significant pre-intervention imbalance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23686991
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effects of Modified Yogasana and Prop-Assisted Yogasana on Pain, Disability, and C-Reactive Protein in Adults with Mechanical Low Back Pain

Dr.C.V.Jayanthy, E. Prabhakaran, Dr.S.Natarajan
2 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Comparative Effects of Modified Yogasana and Prop-Assisted Yogasana on Pain, Disability, and C-Reactive Protein in Adults with Mechanical Low Back Pain

Dr.C.V.Jayanthy, E. Prabhakaran, Dr.S.Natarajan
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic mechanical low back pain is associated with persistent pain, functional disability, and reduced participation in daily activities. Modified and prop-assisted Yogasana may provide different levels of active movement and external support, however, comparative evidence remains limited.Objective: To compare the effects of modified Yogasana and prop-assisted Yogasana on pain intensity, back-related disability, and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) in men with chronic mechanical low back pain.Methods: This non-randomized controlled study included 90 men aged 35–45 years who were assigned to a Modified Yogasana Group, Prop-Assisted Yogasana Group, or medication-only Control Group, with 30 participants in each group. Both Yogasana interventions were administered for 12 weeks, five sessions per week, for 60 minutes per session. Pain intensity, Oswestry Disability Index scores, and serum CRP were assessed at pretest, mid-test, and post-test. Data were analysed using one-way analysis of variance and Scheffé’s post-hoc test, with significance established at p < 0.05.Results: Baseline pain and disability did not differ significantly among the groups. At post-test, pain scores were significantly lower in the Modified Yogasana Group (3.25 ± 0.71) and Prop-Assisted Yogasana Group (3.82 ± 0.89) than in the Control Group (7.07 ± 0.76, F = 205.10, p < 0.05). Modified Yogasana also produced a significantly lower pain score than prop-assisted Yogasana. Post-test disability scores were 23.96 ± 4.18, 26.09 ± 5.33, and 44.13 ± 4.56, respectively (F = 165.67, p < 0.05). Both Yogasana groups differed significantly from the Control Group, whereas the difference between the two Yogasana groups was not significant. Post-test CRP values were 3.09 ± 0.88, 4.38 ± 0.79, and 6.50 ± 1.05 mg/L, respectively (F = 106.49, p < 0.05). However, CRP differed significantly among the groups at baseline.Conclusion: Both modified and prop-assisted Yogasana were associated with reduced pain and disability compared with medication alone. Modified Yogasana produced a greater reduction in pain, while both interventions demonstrated comparable improvements in disability. The CRP findings require cautious interpretation and confirmation through baseline-adjusted analysis because of the significant pre-intervention imbalance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon