Beyond the Last Petrol Pump

India's March 2026 LPG and Natural Gas Control Orders — issued under the Essential Commodities Act 1955 in response to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz — demonstrated both the institutional capacity and the structural limitations of India's downstream petroleum architecture. While the government's crisis response was effective, it was reactive. This paper identifies five structural deficiencies: the absence of an operational neutral wholesale petroleum market; the absence of a comparably clear standalone open-access framework for downstream terminal and rack capacity used for product lifting by independent operators; the absence of a formal industry-wide emergency petroleum stockholding framework specifying obligations, reporting and release conditions; the absence of a pre-established National Essential Petroleum User Registry (NEPUR); and the absence of a pre-crisis framework for triggering domestic supply-protection measures. The paper argues that the March 2026 disruption exposed institutional questions about how available petroleum supply is priced, moved, buffered and prioritised during stress. Five targeted policy steps are proposed, several of which can be pursued within existing statutory authority while others would require subordinate regulatory measures or amendments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Public Policy Review
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55763/ippr.2026.07.04.004
Primary Topic
Global Energy Security and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond the Last Petrol Pump

Rahul Sharma
Indian Public Policy Review
Global Energy Security and Policy
article

Beyond the Last Petrol Pump

Rahul Sharma
article en

Abstract

India's March 2026 LPG and Natural Gas Control Orders — issued under the Essential Commodities Act 1955 in response to disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz — demonstrated both the institutional capacity and the structural limitations of India's downstream petroleum architecture. While the government's crisis response was effective, it was reactive. This paper identifies five structural deficiencies: the absence of an operational neutral wholesale petroleum market; the absence of a comparably clear standalone open-access framework for downstream terminal and rack capacity used for product lifting by independent operators; the absence of a formal industry-wide emergency petroleum stockholding framework specifying obligations, reporting and release conditions; the absence of a pre-established National Essential Petroleum User Registry (NEPUR); and the absence of a pre-crisis framework for triggering domestic supply-protection measures. The paper argues that the March 2026 disruption exposed institutional questions about how available petroleum supply is priced, moved, buffered and prioritised during stress. Five targeted policy steps are proposed, several of which can be pursued within existing statutory authority while others would require subordinate regulatory measures or amendments.

Indian Public Policy ReviewVol. 7(4)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Global Energy Security and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon