The Role and Institutional Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Removal Technologies in Climate Governance

As the global climate crisis intensifies, and with the establishment of the 1.5℃ temperature control target by the Paris Agreement, relying only on emission reduction makes it difficult to reach the net zero target. Therefore, Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) is accelerating towards early commercialization and becoming a key strategy for global climate governance in climate governance discourse has changed significantly. From the "Supplementary Options" in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report to the "scientifically necessary path" for the 1.5°C temperature control target, CDR has now been elevated to the third pillar of global governance alongside "emission reduction and adaptation". This paper adopts the document analysis method and comparative analysis. The study found that CDR has completed the institutional transformation from "supplement" to "dependence" in climate governance discourse, but this transformation may produce a "moral hazard" effect - that is, excessive commitment to immature technologies may weaken the motivation for current emission reduction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2026.jo38365
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role and Institutional Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Removal Technologies in Climate Governance

Jiayu Shen
1 links
Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

The Role and Institutional Impacts of Carbon Dioxide Removal Technologies in Climate Governance

Jiayu Shen
article en

Abstract

As the global climate crisis intensifies, and with the establishment of the 1.5℃ temperature control target by the Paris Agreement, relying only on emission reduction makes it difficult to reach the net zero target. Therefore, Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) is accelerating towards early commercialization and becoming a key strategy for global climate governance in climate governance discourse has changed significantly. From the "Supplementary Options" in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report to the "scientifically necessary path" for the 1.5°C temperature control target, CDR has now been elevated to the third pillar of global governance alongside "emission reduction and adaptation". This paper adopts the document analysis method and comparative analysis. The study found that CDR has completed the institutional transformation from "supplement" to "dependence" in climate governance discourse, but this transformation may produce a "moral hazard" effect - that is, excessive commitment to immature technologies may weaken the motivation for current emission reduction.

Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public MediaVol. 151(1)
Education University of Hong Kong (HK)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon