Environmental scan of hearing health services and databases in Australia: barriers and enablers for a national child deafness Learning Health System

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a national environmental scan of child hearing health-related services and databases as part of the Australian National Child Hearing Health Outcomes Registry program, and to identify system-level barriers and enablers to developing a coordinated Learning Health System for deaf and hard-of-hearing children. METHODS: A cross-sectional national survey of organisations providing hearing health-related services or managing data for Australian deaf and hard-of-hearing children. The survey examined the scope and practices related to data collection, standardisation, interoperability, stewardship, and governance. RESULTS: Ninety-nine respondents from 92 organisations delivering 290 services participated. The scan identified a disjointed data landscape. Standardised data were limited, with inconsistent capture of key variables across organisations and 49.4% rating their data quality as acceptable or good. Interoperability was constrained by heterogenous data practices, including use of multiple databases (34.3%), limited external reporting (24.2%) and lack of accessible data dictionaries (71.9%). Stewardship and data governance arrangements were variable, with fewer than half of organisations reporting formal consent (47.6%), privacy statements (51.2%) or ethics oversight (38.1%). Despite these challenges, 56.5 and 54.8% of organisations expressed interest in data linkage and research participation, indicating readiness for coordinated system development. CONCLUSION: Despite Australia's substantial investment in newborn hearing screening and hearing health-related services, fragmented data systems limit Australia's ability to monitor outcomes, equity and system performance in child hearing health. However, strong stakeholder interest in data linkage provides important momentum. These findings inform policy and service planning, and support staged development of a national child deafness Learning Health System through the Australian National Child Hearing Health Outcomes Registry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Health Review
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1071/ah26074
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental scan of hearing health services and databases in Australia: barriers and enablers for a national child deafness Learning Health System

Alanna N Gillespie, Claire Iseli, Kayla Elliott, Kelvin Kong et al.
Australian Health Review
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Environmental scan of hearing health services and databases in Australia: barriers and enablers for a national child deafness Learning Health System

Alanna N Gillespie, Claire Iseli, Kayla Elliott, Kelvin Kong, Valerie Sung, Zeffie Poulakis, Rachael Beswick, Catherine M. McMahon, Evelyn M. Deutscher, Greg Leigh, Whitney Zi-Yang Qian, Lauren McHugh, Linda E. Smith, Vanessa Bond, The ANCHOR Collaborative, Jing Wang
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct a national environmental scan of child hearing health-related services and databases as part of the Australian National Child Hearing Health Outcomes Registry program, and to identify system-level barriers and enablers to developing a coordinated Learning Health System for deaf and hard-of-hearing children. METHODS: A cross-sectional national survey of organisations providing hearing health-related services or managing data for Australian deaf and hard-of-hearing children. The survey examined the scope and practices related to data collection, standardisation, interoperability, stewardship, and governance. RESULTS: Ninety-nine respondents from 92 organisations delivering 290 services participated. The scan identified a disjointed data landscape. Standardised data were limited, with inconsistent capture of key variables across organisations and 49.4% rating their data quality as acceptable or good. Interoperability was constrained by heterogenous data practices, including use of multiple databases (34.3%), limited external reporting (24.2%) and lack of accessible data dictionaries (71.9%). Stewardship and data governance arrangements were variable, with fewer than half of organisations reporting formal consent (47.6%), privacy statements (51.2%) or ethics oversight (38.1%). Despite these challenges, 56.5 and 54.8% of organisations expressed interest in data linkage and research participation, indicating readiness for coordinated system development. CONCLUSION: Despite Australia's substantial investment in newborn hearing screening and hearing health-related services, fragmented data systems limit Australia's ability to monitor outcomes, equity and system performance in child hearing health. However, strong stakeholder interest in data linkage provides important momentum. These findings inform policy and service planning, and support staged development of a national child deafness Learning Health System through the Australian National Child Hearing Health Outcomes Registry.

Australian Health ReviewVol. 50(5)
Royal Children's Hospital (AU), Center for Applied Linguistics (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Dallas International University (US), NextSense (AU), Holmes Regional Medical Center (US), The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU), Children’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU), Royal Hospital for Sick Children (GB), Institute of Linguistics (CN), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Health and Human Development (2HD) Research Network (CM), Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU), Newcastle University (GB)
National Health and Medical Research Council
Good health and well-being, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon