The Executioner in the Sixteenth Century Duties, Income and Social Position in the Holy Roman Empire, with Particular Attention to Goslar and the Kruse Family

The sixteenth-century Scharfrichter or Nachrichter was more than an official who carried out deathsentences. He served the courts, but could also hold rights or contracts relating to the collectionand processing of animal carcasses, municipal cleaning and other work. Some executioners treatedinjured people and animals. Their income could comprise a fixed official allowance, fees forindividual assignments, proceeds from processing dead animals, and payments made by privateclients.The central conclusion is that an executioner's livelihood did not depend solely on the number ofexecutions. The precise combination of duties varied from town to town and must be establishedfor each executioner individually, from his appointment and local accounts. Payments made inGoslar to Meister Lorenz in 1578 and 1588 provide concrete examples. An additional documentfrom Verden contains a fee agreement of 24 October 1687 with Meister Wilhelm Cruse. This latersource clarifies the composition of judicial fees and the role of assistants in the business of a Kruseexecutioner.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23686851
Primary Topic
Medieval and Early Modern Justice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Executioner in the Sixteenth Century Duties, Income and Social Position in the Holy Roman Empire, with Particular Attention to Goslar and the Kruse Family

Hans Kruse
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Medieval and Early Modern Justice
article

The Executioner in the Sixteenth Century Duties, Income and Social Position in the Holy Roman Empire, with Particular Attention to Goslar and the Kruse Family

Hans Kruse
article en

Abstract

The sixteenth-century Scharfrichter or Nachrichter was more than an official who carried out deathsentences. He served the courts, but could also hold rights or contracts relating to the collectionand processing of animal carcasses, municipal cleaning and other work. Some executioners treatedinjured people and animals. Their income could comprise a fixed official allowance, fees forindividual assignments, proceeds from processing dead animals, and payments made by privateclients.The central conclusion is that an executioner's livelihood did not depend solely on the number ofexecutions. The precise combination of duties varied from town to town and must be establishedfor each executioner individually, from his appointment and local accounts. Payments made inGoslar to Meister Lorenz in 1578 and 1588 provide concrete examples. An additional documentfrom Verden contains a fee agreement of 24 October 1687 with Meister Wilhelm Cruse. This latersource clarifies the composition of judicial fees and the role of assistants in the business of a Kruseexecutioner.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Medieval and Early Modern Justice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon