Eastern branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences in the economic development strategy of Asian Russia in the 1930s — mid-1950s

This article examines the development of academic institutions in the country's eastern macrozone in the context of a regional economic strategy. It is noted that plans for their organization began to be discussed as early as the late imperial era. Thus, the Academy of Sciences hoped to increase its contribution to the study and development of natural resources. However, the practical implementation of this task began during the first five-year plans. Based on historiographic background and documentary sources, the article shows the difficulties encountered, how they were overcome, and why the actual development trajectory of academic institutions in the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East diverged from the adopted plans. It is concluded that only in the first post-war years was it possible to establish a comprehensive network of branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences, which became "springboards" for the advancement of "big science" in the east of the country. This played a significant role in maintaining the high rate of economic development in these regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History and modern perspectives
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33693/2658-4654-2026-8-3-15-23
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Eastern branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences in the economic development strategy of Asian Russia in the 1930s — mid-1950s

Evgeny Artemov
2 links
History and modern perspectives
Soviet and Russian History
article

Eastern branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences in the economic development strategy of Asian Russia in the 1930s — mid-1950s

Evgeny Artemov
article en

Abstract

This article examines the development of academic institutions in the country's eastern macrozone in the context of a regional economic strategy. It is noted that plans for their organization began to be discussed as early as the late imperial era. Thus, the Academy of Sciences hoped to increase its contribution to the study and development of natural resources. However, the practical implementation of this task began during the first five-year plans. Based on historiographic background and documentary sources, the article shows the difficulties encountered, how they were overcome, and why the actual development trajectory of academic institutions in the Urals, Siberia, and the Far East diverged from the adopted plans. It is concluded that only in the first post-war years was it possible to establish a comprehensive network of branches of the USSR Academy of Sciences, which became "springboards" for the advancement of "big science" in the east of the country. This played a significant role in maintaining the high rate of economic development in these regions.

History and modern perspectivesVol. 8(3)
Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RU), Institute of History and Archaeology (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon