Quantum Logic Gates: Principles, Physical Implementations and Recent Progress

This note explains how quantum logic gates work, which gate sets are universal, and why non-Clifford (T) gates dominate the cost of fault-tolerant computation. Comparing public results across six platforms with evidence up to 7 October 2026: in the peer-reviewed literature, single-qubit error on a single ion reaches 1.5×10⁻⁷ and best single-pair two-qubit errors lie in the 10⁻³–10⁻⁴ range, while about 8.4×10⁻⁵ on a two-ion prototype remains a preprint; system-wide averages can be about an order of magnitude worse than best single-pair values (for example, 7.9×10⁻⁴ on the 98-qubit Helios, and 0.33% CZ error with all gates running simultaneously on Willow's error-correction chip according to Google's specification). Because reporting conventions differ, cross-platform comparisons are indicative only. The note then reviews the move from physical to logical gates — lattice surgery, logical non-Clifford gates and magic-state preparation — most of which remain at small code distance, some with postselection, and many still in preprints. It is a structured evidence synthesis and technical guide based on public literature and reports no new experiments or measurements.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23697301
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantum Logic Gates: Principles, Physical Implementations and Recent Progress

Yulin Liu
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Quantum Logic Gates: Principles, Physical Implementations and Recent Progress

Yulin Liu
article en

Abstract

This note explains how quantum logic gates work, which gate sets are universal, and why non-Clifford (T) gates dominate the cost of fault-tolerant computation. Comparing public results across six platforms with evidence up to 7 October 2026: in the peer-reviewed literature, single-qubit error on a single ion reaches 1.5×10⁻⁷ and best single-pair two-qubit errors lie in the 10⁻³–10⁻⁴ range, while about 8.4×10⁻⁵ on a two-ion prototype remains a preprint; system-wide averages can be about an order of magnitude worse than best single-pair values (for example, 7.9×10⁻⁴ on the 98-qubit Helios, and 0.33% CZ error with all gates running simultaneously on Willow's error-correction chip according to Google's specification). Because reporting conventions differ, cross-platform comparisons are indicative only. The note then reviews the move from physical to logical gates — lattice surgery, logical non-Clifford gates and magic-state preparation — most of which remain at small code distance, some with postselection, and many still in preprints. It is a structured evidence synthesis and technical guide based on public literature and reports no new experiments or measurements.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon