Male chickadees with better spatial cognition sire more extra-pair young

Across animal taxa, females commonly mate with more than one male, even in monogamous mating systems. These extra-pair copulations and resulting young may increase the fitness of the female via a variety of mechanisms. The ‘good genes’ hypothesis suggests that socially monogamous females mate outside their pair bond to increase the fitness of their offspring via indirect genetic benefits, because extra-pair males do not provide parental care. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying extra-pair paternity in nonmigratory, food-caching mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Chickadees rely on spatial cognition to recover scattered food caches and variation in spatial cognition is associated with increased survival, longer lifespan, and is heritable. However, less is known about the role of sexual selection on spatial cognitive abilities. In the current study, we found that 1. males with better spatial cognitive abilities sired more extra-pair young and produce heavier offspring in their own nests compared to their poorer performing counterparts, and 2. extra-pair males had significantly better spatial cognition than the social males they cuckolded. These results suggest that sexual selection shapes the evolution of spatial cognition in food-caching chickadees and are consistent with the good genes hypothesis, which posits that females gain indirect genetic benefits via extra-pair young.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
eLife
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7554/elife.110905.2
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Male chickadees with better spatial cognition sire more extra-pair young

Irby J. Lovette, Правосудов Владимир Витальевич, Joseph F. Welklin, Benjamin R. Sonnenberg et al.
3 links
eLife
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
preprint

Male chickadees with better spatial cognition sire more extra-pair young

Irby J. Lovette, Правосудов Владимир Витальевич, Joseph F. Welklin, Benjamin R. Sonnenberg, Angela M. Pitera, Bronwyn G. Butcher, Carrie L. Branch, Lauren M. Benedict, Michael S. Webster, Virginia K. Heinen, Eli S. Bridge
preprint en

Abstract

Across animal taxa, females commonly mate with more than one male, even in monogamous mating systems. These extra-pair copulations and resulting young may increase the fitness of the female via a variety of mechanisms. The ‘good genes’ hypothesis suggests that socially monogamous females mate outside their pair bond to increase the fitness of their offspring via indirect genetic benefits, because extra-pair males do not provide parental care. We tested this hypothesis by quantifying extra-pair paternity in nonmigratory, food-caching mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli). Chickadees rely on spatial cognition to recover scattered food caches and variation in spatial cognition is associated with increased survival, longer lifespan, and is heritable. However, less is known about the role of sexual selection on spatial cognitive abilities. In the current study, we found that 1. males with better spatial cognitive abilities sired more extra-pair young and produce heavier offspring in their own nests compared to their poorer performing counterparts, and 2. extra-pair males had significantly better spatial cognition than the social males they cuckolded. These results suggest that sexual selection shapes the evolution of spatial cognition in food-caching chickadees and are consistent with the good genes hypothesis, which posits that females gain indirect genetic benefits via extra-pair young.

eLife
Western University (CA), Oregon State University (US), University of Nevada, Reno (US), Cornell University (US), Cornell Lab of Ornithology (US), University of Oklahoma (US)
National Science Foundation, American Ornithological Society, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program
Animal Behavior and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon