Interactional features of model dialogues in Common English 1 textbooks: A conversation analytic approach

Speaking ability comprises not only utterance production but also interactional competence―the ability to jointly construct meaning with an interlocutor. In the Korean EFL context, however, speaking instruction has paid little attention to this interactional dimension, and textbook model dialogues have functioned largely as practice materials for language forms. Drawing on concepts from Conversation Analysis (CA), this study examined the interactional features of the model dialogues in high school Common English 1 textbooks developed under the 2022 Revised National Curriculum. Fifty-one dialogues from five publishers were analyzed in terms of turn constructional units, speaker selection, dispreferred organization, repair, tokens of active participation (backchannels and fillers), topic management, turn length, and lexical density. Turns were predominantly complete sentences, with self-selection prevailing; dispreferred organization was extremely rare and often unmitigated; self-repair was entirely absent; backchannels never constituted independent turns; topic management was skewed toward expansion; and lexical density (52.4% on average) was markedly higher than that of natural conversation. These findings indicate that current model dialogues are insufficient for developing interactional competence. The study suggests incorporating the interactional features of naturally occurring conversation into textbook dialogues and including CA-informed content in teacher education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Secondary English Education
Published
2026-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20487/kasee.19.5.202610.41
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interactional features of model dialogues in Common English 1 textbooks: A conversation analytic approach

Jinkyong Lee
Secondary English Education
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Interactional features of model dialogues in Common English 1 textbooks: A conversation analytic approach

Jinkyong Lee
article en

Abstract

Speaking ability comprises not only utterance production but also interactional competence―the ability to jointly construct meaning with an interlocutor. In the Korean EFL context, however, speaking instruction has paid little attention to this interactional dimension, and textbook model dialogues have functioned largely as practice materials for language forms. Drawing on concepts from Conversation Analysis (CA), this study examined the interactional features of the model dialogues in high school Common English 1 textbooks developed under the 2022 Revised National Curriculum. Fifty-one dialogues from five publishers were analyzed in terms of turn constructional units, speaker selection, dispreferred organization, repair, tokens of active participation (backchannels and fillers), topic management, turn length, and lexical density. Turns were predominantly complete sentences, with self-selection prevailing; dispreferred organization was extremely rare and often unmitigated; self-repair was entirely absent; backchannels never constituted independent turns; topic management was skewed toward expansion; and lexical density (52.4% on average) was markedly higher than that of natural conversation. These findings indicate that current model dialogues are insufficient for developing interactional competence. The study suggests incorporating the interactional features of naturally occurring conversation into textbook dialogues and including CA-informed content in teacher education.

Secondary English EducationVol. 19(5)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon