Learning to Back a Trailer in Response to Haptic and Verbal Corrective Cues

Haptic cues intended to support development of a manual skill may hold advantages over verbal cues in that they are delivered directly to the learner’s hands and can shape the movement directly, whereas a verbal cue must first be decoded and translated into a motor command. Haptic guidance has improved learning of steering and timing tasks, with the largest gains among learners of lower initial skill or facing greater difficulty. To test our hypothesis that haptic cueing will improve performance in a manual learning task better than verbal cueing, we compared the performance of three participant groups at backing a hitched trailer. The first group received Haptic, the second Verbal cues, and the third group received No Assistance. Preliminary results show the benefits of assistance, but so far without significant differences between the Haptic and Verbal groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261498795
Primary Topic
Motor Control and Adaptation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning to Back a Trailer in Response to Haptic and Verbal Corrective Cues

R. Brent Gillespie, Hannah Báez, John Gideon, Jean Costa
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Motor Control and Adaptation
article

Learning to Back a Trailer in Response to Haptic and Verbal Corrective Cues

R. Brent Gillespie, Hannah Báez, John Gideon, Jean Costa
article en

Abstract

Haptic cues intended to support development of a manual skill may hold advantages over verbal cues in that they are delivered directly to the learner’s hands and can shape the movement directly, whereas a verbal cue must first be decoded and translated into a motor command. Haptic guidance has improved learning of steering and timing tasks, with the largest gains among learners of lower initial skill or facing greater difficulty. To test our hypothesis that haptic cueing will improve performance in a manual learning task better than verbal cueing, we compared the performance of three participant groups at backing a hitched trailer. The first group received Haptic, the second Verbal cues, and the third group received No Assistance. Preliminary results show the benefits of assistance, but so far without significant differences between the Haptic and Verbal groups.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
University of Michigan (US), Toyota Research Institute (US)
Toyota Research Institute
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Motor Control and Adaptation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon