Naturalised difference: everyday mechanisms of gender bias against female students in Chinese universities

Despite rising female enrolment in Chinese universities, gender bias persists through everyday practices that appear neutral and are difficult to contest. This study examines how a shared classificatory logic reproduces bias across academic interaction, university space and intimate life. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of practice, symbolic capital and symbolic violence, it conceptualises gender bias as embedded in routine practices. Based on 108 hours of observation and interviews with 32 female students and nine teachers at three universities, the study identifies three mechanisms: unequal allocation of epistemic time, attention and recognition in academic interaction; differential spatial ease shaping female students’ bodily regulation; and gendered norms in intimate life that intensify scrutiny. The findings reveal how gender bias is reproduced under the guise of neutrality, highlighting the limits of gender-neutral approaches in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cambridge Journal of Education
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764x.2026.2737660
Primary Topic
Gender, Sexuality, and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Naturalised difference: everyday mechanisms of gender bias against female students in Chinese universities

Xiaoming Tian, Lihua Xu, Siyi Sun
Cambridge Journal of Education
Gender, Sexuality, and Education
article

Naturalised difference: everyday mechanisms of gender bias against female students in Chinese universities

Xiaoming Tian, Lihua Xu, Siyi Sun
article en

Abstract

Despite rising female enrolment in Chinese universities, gender bias persists through everyday practices that appear neutral and are difficult to contest. This study examines how a shared classificatory logic reproduces bias across academic interaction, university space and intimate life. Drawing on Bourdieu’s concepts of practice, symbolic capital and symbolic violence, it conceptualises gender bias as embedded in routine practices. Based on 108 hours of observation and interviews with 32 female students and nine teachers at three universities, the study identifies three mechanisms: unequal allocation of epistemic time, attention and recognition in academic interaction; differential spatial ease shaping female students’ bodily regulation; and gendered norms in intimate life that intensify scrutiny. The findings reveal how gender bias is reproduced under the guise of neutrality, highlighting the limits of gender-neutral approaches in higher education.

Cambridge Journal of Education
Xi’an University of Posts and Telecommunications (CN)
Reduced inequalities, Quality education, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Gender, Sexuality, and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon