Ameliorating effects and mechanisms of therapeutic electrical stimulation on the recurrent laryngeal nerve injury model in rats
Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) injury is a rare but serious complication of thyroid surgery and other neck surgery, leading to vocal fold paralysis. The aim of this study was to investigate the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of therapeutic electrical stimulation (TES) on RLN regeneration in a rat model of RLN crush injury. Sprague–Dawley rats were randomly divided into groups of RLN injury and RLN injury + TES, and received RLN injury operation. The RLN injury + TES group received daily recurrent laryngeal nerve electrical stimulation for 14 days. Functional recovery including vocal fold mobility scoring and electrophysiological measurements was assessed. Structural changes were evaluated using histology and transmission electron microscopy. In comparison with observation management, TES improved vocal fold mobility(p < 0.01) on direct observation, reduced latency and attenuated amplitude loss (p < 0.05) on electrophysiological analysis, promoted fibroblast activation and angiogenesis on histology, and enhanced remyelination and axonal integrity on ultrastructural analysis. The results show that TES accelerates the early phase of functional and structural recovery following RLN injury, as evidenced by improved vocal fold mobility, electrophysiological parameters, and ultrastructural organization at 14 days post-injury.
Authors
- Ming Tian
- Yizhe Zhang
- 美怡 韓
- Miaoxuan Shi
- Ji Han
- Wei Zheng
- Jing Tian
Institutions
- Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Dongzhimen Hospital Affiliated to Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Xiyuan Hospital (CN)
- China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scientific Reports
- Published
- 2026-10-28
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-58788-1
- Primary Topic
- Nerve injury and regeneration
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00