Low‐Use vs. High‐Use Physical Restraint in Older Adults With Sepsis Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND: Physical restraints are commonly used in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), yet evidence regarding their effectiveness in older patients with sepsis is limited. This study evaluated whether a low-use physical restraint strategy improves outcomes in older patients with sepsis requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in five ICUs in China from August 2023 to March 2026. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with invasive mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned (1:1) to a low-use restraint strategy (restraints applied only for severe agitation) or a high-use restraint strategy (routine restraint use until recovery of consciousness and liberation from mechanical ventilation). The primary outcome was days alive without delirium or coma within 7 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included delirium incidence, ventilator-free days, coma-free days, sedative exposure, 28-day mortality, and safety events. Analyses were performed using intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and inverse probability weighting approaches. RESULTS: Among 485 randomized patients (median age, 74 years; 60.4% male), 244 received low-use and 241 high-use restraint. Delirium- and coma-free days did not differ between groups (adjusted mean difference, 0.17 days; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.54; p = 0.37). Low-use restraint was associated with more ventilator-free days (0.69 days; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; p < 0.001) and coma-free days (0.46 days; 95% CI, 0.19-0.74; p = 0.001). No significant between-group differences were observed in delirium incidence, sedative exposure, 28-day mortality, or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among older mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, a low-use physical restraint strategy did not improve days alive without delirium or coma but was associated with more ventilator-free and coma-free days. These findings suggest that reducing restraint use may facilitate short-term recovery, although the safety of restraint minimization requires further evaluation. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR1900025850.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.70814
Primary Topic
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low‐Use vs. High‐Use Physical Restraint in Older Adults With Sepsis Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Zhigang Chang, Na Cui, Hao Wang, Wenliang Ma et al.
4 links
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
article

Low‐Use vs. High‐Use Physical Restraint in Older Adults With Sepsis Receiving Mechanical Ventilation: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Zhigang Chang, Na Cui, Hao Wang, Wenliang Ma, Jingyi Wang, Yuefu Wang, Yue Han
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physical restraints are commonly used in patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit (ICU), yet evidence regarding their effectiveness in older patients with sepsis is limited. This study evaluated whether a low-use physical restraint strategy improves outcomes in older patients with sepsis requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. METHODS: This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial was conducted in five ICUs in China from August 2023 to March 2026. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with invasive mechanical ventilation were randomly assigned (1:1) to a low-use restraint strategy (restraints applied only for severe agitation) or a high-use restraint strategy (routine restraint use until recovery of consciousness and liberation from mechanical ventilation). The primary outcome was days alive without delirium or coma within 7 days after randomization. Secondary outcomes included delirium incidence, ventilator-free days, coma-free days, sedative exposure, 28-day mortality, and safety events. Analyses were performed using intention-to-treat, per-protocol, and inverse probability weighting approaches. RESULTS: Among 485 randomized patients (median age, 74 years; 60.4% male), 244 received low-use and 241 high-use restraint. Delirium- and coma-free days did not differ between groups (adjusted mean difference, 0.17 days; 95% CI, -0.20 to 0.54; p = 0.37). Low-use restraint was associated with more ventilator-free days (0.69 days; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; p < 0.001) and coma-free days (0.46 days; 95% CI, 0.19-0.74; p = 0.001). No significant between-group differences were observed in delirium incidence, sedative exposure, 28-day mortality, or safety outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among older mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis, a low-use physical restraint strategy did not improve days alive without delirium or coma but was associated with more ventilator-free and coma-free days. These findings suggest that reducing restraint use may facilitate short-term recovery, although the safety of restraint minimization requires further evaluation. TRAIL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR1900025850.

Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Jishuitan Hospital (CN), Beijing Hospital (CN), Beijing Shijitan Hospital (CN), Beijing Chaoyang Emergency Medical Center (CN)
Beijing Health Promotion Association, Beijing Municipal Health Commission, Wu Jieping Medical Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon