Comparison of internal fixation outcomes in young femoral neck fractures: three cannulated compression screws versus the femoral neck system

Background Femoral neck fractures in young patients typically result from traumatic injury, present significant treatment challenges, and are associated with a high risk of complications. The cannulated compression screw (CCS) is a common fixation device, whereas the femoral neck system (FNS) is a newer fixation device. Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the FNS and CCS in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young patients. Methods Between September 2021 and September 2023, 82 patients with femoral neck fracture aged 18–60 years were admitted to our hospital. According to the different fixation methods, the patients were divided into the FNS (38 cases) and CCS (44 cases) groups. The perioperative indicators, complications and follow-up function scores were compared between the two groups, and the follow-up time was ≥ 12 months. Results The FNS group had shorter operation time (53.71 ± 11.20 vs. 64.61 ± 11.27 min, p < 0.001) and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times (14.05 ± 3.13 vs. 21.55 ± 5.06, p < 0.001). However, the incision length (38.05 ± 8.85 mm vs. 20.32 ± 6.34 mm, p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (85.82 ± 23.62 mL vs. 65.89 ± 20.98 mL, p < 0.001) were greater. The FNS group demonstrated a lower rate of fixation failure (5.26% vs. 22.73%, p = 0.026) and a lower incidence of lateral thigh irritation (7.89% vs. 29.55%, p = 0.014), along with less severe femoral neck shortening (4.68 ± 2.04 vs. 7.14 ± 2.27 mm, p < 0.001). Patients in the FNS group achieved partial weight-bearing (3.08 ± 1.16 vs. 5.30 ± 1.50 weeks, p < 0.001) and full weight-bearing (11.71 ± 1.84 vs. 14.39 ± 2.07 weeks, p < 0.001) significantly earlier. The VAS scores at 3 and 7 days after surgery were significantly lower ( p < 0.001), and the Harris scores at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were significantly higher ( p < 0.05); however, the magnitude of Harris score differences fell below the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and both groups achieved excellent final outcomes. Conclusion Compared to CCS, FNS has better intraoperative efficiency, a lower internal fixation failure rate, and less severe femoral neck shortening in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. However, given the retrospective design, relatively small sample size, limited follow-up time, and differential follow-up duration between the groups, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Surgery
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2026.1781680
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of internal fixation outcomes in young femoral neck fractures: three cannulated compression screws versus the femoral neck system

李学军, Meng Lu, Daojing Qiu, Ben Xiao et al.
1 links
Frontiers in Surgery
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

Comparison of internal fixation outcomes in young femoral neck fractures: three cannulated compression screws versus the femoral neck system

李学军, Meng Lu, Daojing Qiu, Ben Xiao, Xiaobin Chen, Yuanming He
article en

Abstract

Background Femoral neck fractures in young patients typically result from traumatic injury, present significant treatment challenges, and are associated with a high risk of complications. The cannulated compression screw (CCS) is a common fixation device, whereas the femoral neck system (FNS) is a newer fixation device. Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of the FNS and CCS in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young patients. Methods Between September 2021 and September 2023, 82 patients with femoral neck fracture aged 18–60 years were admitted to our hospital. According to the different fixation methods, the patients were divided into the FNS (38 cases) and CCS (44 cases) groups. The perioperative indicators, complications and follow-up function scores were compared between the two groups, and the follow-up time was ≥ 12 months. Results The FNS group had shorter operation time (53.71 ± 11.20 vs. 64.61 ± 11.27 min, p < 0.001) and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy times (14.05 ± 3.13 vs. 21.55 ± 5.06, p < 0.001). However, the incision length (38.05 ± 8.85 mm vs. 20.32 ± 6.34 mm, p < 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (85.82 ± 23.62 mL vs. 65.89 ± 20.98 mL, p < 0.001) were greater. The FNS group demonstrated a lower rate of fixation failure (5.26% vs. 22.73%, p = 0.026) and a lower incidence of lateral thigh irritation (7.89% vs. 29.55%, p = 0.014), along with less severe femoral neck shortening (4.68 ± 2.04 vs. 7.14 ± 2.27 mm, p < 0.001). Patients in the FNS group achieved partial weight-bearing (3.08 ± 1.16 vs. 5.30 ± 1.50 weeks, p < 0.001) and full weight-bearing (11.71 ± 1.84 vs. 14.39 ± 2.07 weeks, p < 0.001) significantly earlier. The VAS scores at 3 and 7 days after surgery were significantly lower ( p < 0.001), and the Harris scores at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery were significantly higher ( p < 0.05); however, the magnitude of Harris score differences fell below the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), and both groups achieved excellent final outcomes. Conclusion Compared to CCS, FNS has better intraoperative efficiency, a lower internal fixation failure rate, and less severe femoral neck shortening in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in young adults. However, given the retrospective design, relatively small sample size, limited follow-up time, and differential follow-up duration between the groups, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution.

Frontiers in SurgeryVol. 13
Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN), Capital Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon