Incidence- and acceptance-angle effects on soiled solar mirror reflectance

The reflectance of a soiled solar mirror depends not only on the soiling level, but also on the angle of incidence and on the acceptance half-angle of the detector or of the receiver. This hinders the comparison of different reflectometers and the translation of field readings into system-relevant optical losses. We measured full-hemisphere bidirectional reflectance distributions of second-surface glass mirrors soiled with desert dust from Australia, Kuwait and Spain, and of mirrors soiled naturally outdoors in Spain, for incidence angles 8 ∘ – 65 ∘ and acceptance half-angles 12.5 -- 145 mrad. Soiling broadens the specular lobe into a forward-scattered halo whose characteristic angular width ( 48 -- 54 mrad) is almost independent of dust type, whereas its amplitude is specific to the dust and to the dust loading. On this basis we developed a compact physical model that separates the reflected flux into a non-interacting specular core, described by a generalised Beer–Lambert law, and a scattered halo with explicit angular redistribution. The model uses five dust-specific parameters and one cleanliness parameter, the effective optical depth ( 0.012 -- 0.224 ), which can be inferred from a single routine reflectometer reading. It reproduces all measured acceptance curves with a mean deviation of 0.005 in absolute reflectance and a median coefficient of determination of 0.993 . Reflectometers operating near normal incidence with wide acceptance cones overestimate the receiver-relevant reflectance by 5 to 7 percentage points at 90 % cleanliness, and by 3 to 19 percentage points across a central-receiver field, depending on the soiling level and on the position of the heliostat. The model thus converts a single field reading into system-relevant reflectance for any geometry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Solar Energy
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2026.115269
Primary Topic
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence- and acceptance-angle effects on soiled solar mirror reflectance

Maitane Ferreres Eceiza, Gregor Bern, Moritz Bitterling, Peter Nitz et al.
1 links
Solar Energy
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
article

Incidence- and acceptance-angle effects on soiled solar mirror reflectance

Maitane Ferreres Eceiza, Gregor Bern, Moritz Bitterling, Peter Nitz, Christof Wittwer, Anna Heimsath, Werner Platzer
article en

Abstract

The reflectance of a soiled solar mirror depends not only on the soiling level, but also on the angle of incidence and on the acceptance half-angle of the detector or of the receiver. This hinders the comparison of different reflectometers and the translation of field readings into system-relevant optical losses. We measured full-hemisphere bidirectional reflectance distributions of second-surface glass mirrors soiled with desert dust from Australia, Kuwait and Spain, and of mirrors soiled naturally outdoors in Spain, for incidence angles 8 ∘ – 65 ∘ and acceptance half-angles 12.5 -- 145 mrad. Soiling broadens the specular lobe into a forward-scattered halo whose characteristic angular width ( 48 -- 54 mrad) is almost independent of dust type, whereas its amplitude is specific to the dust and to the dust loading. On this basis we developed a compact physical model that separates the reflected flux into a non-interacting specular core, described by a generalised Beer–Lambert law, and a scattered halo with explicit angular redistribution. The model uses five dust-specific parameters and one cleanliness parameter, the effective optical depth ( 0.012 -- 0.224 ), which can be inferred from a single routine reflectometer reading. It reproduces all measured acceptance curves with a mean deviation of 0.005 in absolute reflectance and a median coefficient of determination of 0.993 . Reflectometers operating near normal incidence with wide acceptance cones overestimate the receiver-relevant reflectance by 5 to 7 percentage points at 90 % cleanliness, and by 3 to 19 percentage points across a central-receiver field, depending on the soiling level and on the position of the heliostat. The model thus converts a single field reading into system-relevant reflectance for any geometry.

Solar EnergyVol. 320
Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems (DE)
Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Klimaschutz, Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon