Prenatal diagnostic outcomes and positive predictive values in 1,326 pregnancies with high-risk non-invasive prenatal testing results

Objective To investigate the prenatal diagnostic outcomes of pregnant women with high-risk non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results and to explore factors influencing the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT. Methods Clinical data from 1,326 pregnant women with high-risk NIPT results who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis at Hebei General Hospital between January 2014 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Chromosomal karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) were used as confirmatory diagnostic methods. PPVs were compared across different types of chromosomal abnormalities, maternal age groups, Z-score categories, ultrasound findings, and before and after implementation of the free NIPT screening policy. Results Among the 1,326 pregnancies with high-risk NIPT results, 648 were confirmed as true positives, yielding an overall PPV of 48.87%. The PPVs for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), and sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs) were 78.61%, 56.36%, 10.53%, and 47.11%, respectively. The PPVs for common autosomal trisomies were higher in the advanced maternal age group than in the non-advanced maternal age group. After implementation of the free screening program, the PPVs for T21, T18, and T13 showed a slight numerical increase, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. PPVs increased with higher Z-scores and were further elevated when multiple ultrasound soft markers or structural anomalies were present. Among SCAs, the PPV for sex chromosome gains was significantly higher than that for sex chromosome losses. Conclusion NIPT demonstrated high screening performance for T21 and T18, whereas T13 and SCAs were associated with relatively high false-positive risks. Clinical interpretation of high-risk NIPT results should integrate maternal age, Z-score, ultrasound phenotype, and confirmatory prenatal diagnostic findings to facilitate stratified genetic counseling and optimize pregnancy management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2026.1899719
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prenatal diagnostic outcomes and positive predictive values in 1,326 pregnancies with high-risk non-invasive prenatal testing results

Bingyi Zhao, Runxuan Du, 邱波, 李亚丽 et al.
2 links
Frontiers in Genetics
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

Prenatal diagnostic outcomes and positive predictive values in 1,326 pregnancies with high-risk non-invasive prenatal testing results

Bingyi Zhao, Runxuan Du, 邱波, 李亚丽, Xuedong Shi, Yingjie Gao
article en

Abstract

Objective To investigate the prenatal diagnostic outcomes of pregnant women with high-risk non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) results and to explore factors influencing the positive predictive value (PPV) of NIPT. Methods Clinical data from 1,326 pregnant women with high-risk NIPT results who underwent invasive prenatal diagnosis at Hebei General Hospital between January 2014 and December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Chromosomal karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and/or copy number variation sequencing (CNV-seq) were used as confirmatory diagnostic methods. PPVs were compared across different types of chromosomal abnormalities, maternal age groups, Z-score categories, ultrasound findings, and before and after implementation of the free NIPT screening policy. Results Among the 1,326 pregnancies with high-risk NIPT results, 648 were confirmed as true positives, yielding an overall PPV of 48.87%. The PPVs for trisomy 21 (T21), trisomy 18 (T18), trisomy 13 (T13), and sex chromosome abnormalities (SCAs) were 78.61%, 56.36%, 10.53%, and 47.11%, respectively. The PPVs for common autosomal trisomies were higher in the advanced maternal age group than in the non-advanced maternal age group. After implementation of the free screening program, the PPVs for T21, T18, and T13 showed a slight numerical increase, the difference between groups was not statistically significant. PPVs increased with higher Z-scores and were further elevated when multiple ultrasound soft markers or structural anomalies were present. Among SCAs, the PPV for sex chromosome gains was significantly higher than that for sex chromosome losses. Conclusion NIPT demonstrated high screening performance for T21 and T18, whereas T13 and SCAs were associated with relatively high false-positive risks. Clinical interpretation of high-risk NIPT results should integrate maternal age, Z-score, ultrasound phenotype, and confirmatory prenatal diagnostic findings to facilitate stratified genetic counseling and optimize pregnancy management.

Frontiers in GeneticsVol. 17
Hebei General Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon