Assessing changes in electrical resistivity signals in simulated mass and single graves over 18 months after burial

Abstract Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has been increasingly explored as a non‐destructive technique for searching for unmarked graves. However, its effectiveness remains uncertain as measured resistivity responses are influenced by burial type, time after burial, soil properties and environmental conditions. Previous studies have reported both positive and negative resistivity anomalies associated with graves, highlighting the need for further controlled investigations. Moreover, limited experimental data exist for ERT measurements over graves containing human cadavers and for mass graves, despite their relevance to forensic and humanitarian investigations. Hence, this study assessed ERT signals associated with individual and mass graves with human cadavers over 18 months post‐burial. We established two mass graves, with one containing six commingled human cadavers and the second containing none serving as a control. Four individual graves were also established, with three containing one cadaver each and the fourth as control. We conducted ERT measurements before establishing the graves and at seven selected intervals after burial. The data were acquired across nine transects spaced every 1.0 m with 0.5 m electrode spacing and a dipole–dipole array. This produced repeated 2D ERT profiles across the graves which we combined in a 3D inversion to obtain quasi‐3D images. We assessed the effects of different electrode arrays and spacings on resolving the graves. The graves showed up to a 70% increase in resistivity ∼3 days after burial, and the resistivity decreased afterward to a minimum at ∼185 days after burial with lower resistivities in the mass grave. The dipole–dipole array and 0.5 m electrode spacing were the most efficient in resolving the graves. The 3D ERT images also captured the outline and depth of the graves. This study validates the use of ERT as a search tool for unmarked graves, particularly mass graves, which produced stronger resistivity contrasts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Near Surface Geophysics
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/nsg.70089
Primary Topic
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing changes in electrical resistivity signals in simulated mass and single graves over 18 months after burial

Carl‐Georg Bank, Daniel J. Wescott, Efemena D. Emmanuel, Hayley L. Mickleburgh et al.
1 links
Near Surface Geophysics
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
article

Assessing changes in electrical resistivity signals in simulated mass and single graves over 18 months after burial

Carl‐Georg Bank, Daniel J. Wescott, Efemena D. Emmanuel, Hayley L. Mickleburgh, Kennedy O. Doro
article en

Abstract

Abstract Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) has been increasingly explored as a non‐destructive technique for searching for unmarked graves. However, its effectiveness remains uncertain as measured resistivity responses are influenced by burial type, time after burial, soil properties and environmental conditions. Previous studies have reported both positive and negative resistivity anomalies associated with graves, highlighting the need for further controlled investigations. Moreover, limited experimental data exist for ERT measurements over graves containing human cadavers and for mass graves, despite their relevance to forensic and humanitarian investigations. Hence, this study assessed ERT signals associated with individual and mass graves with human cadavers over 18 months post‐burial. We established two mass graves, with one containing six commingled human cadavers and the second containing none serving as a control. Four individual graves were also established, with three containing one cadaver each and the fourth as control. We conducted ERT measurements before establishing the graves and at seven selected intervals after burial. The data were acquired across nine transects spaced every 1.0 m with 0.5 m electrode spacing and a dipole–dipole array. This produced repeated 2D ERT profiles across the graves which we combined in a 3D inversion to obtain quasi‐3D images. We assessed the effects of different electrode arrays and spacings on resolving the graves. The graves showed up to a 70% increase in resistivity ∼3 days after burial, and the resistivity decreased afterward to a minimum at ∼185 days after burial with lower resistivities in the mass grave. The dipole–dipole array and 0.5 m electrode spacing were the most efficient in resolving the graves. The 3D ERT images also captured the outline and depth of the graves. This study validates the use of ERT as a search tool for unmarked graves, particularly mass graves, which produced stronger resistivity contrasts.

Near Surface Geophysics
Texas State University (US), University of Toronto (CA), University of Amsterdam (NL), University of Toledo (US)
VINNOVA
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon