Stress testing, credit risk, and bank performance: New evidence from Jordanian commercial banks

This study examines the relationships among stress testing, credit risk, bank capital, and bank profitability in 13 Jordanian commercial banks over 2010–2020. Using a balanced panel and a two-step system GMM estimator, the analysis addresses endogeneity, reverse causality, unobserved heterogeneity, and dynamic persistence in profitability. The results indicate that credit risk has a significant negative effect on profitability, while bank capital has a positive effect. Stress testing is negatively associated with profitability in the short run, consistent with higher compliance costs and more conservative lending, but it strengthens banks’ resilience through improved risk management and capital planning. The study contributes evidence from an emerging banking system by jointly examining stress testing, credit risk, and bank capital in a dynamic framework. The findings suggest that regulators and bank managers should strengthen stress-testing practices, maintain adequate capital buffers, and enhance credit-risk management to support financial resilience and sustainable bank performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Governance and Control Financial Markets & Institutions
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22495/rgcv16i3p17
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stress testing, credit risk, and bank performance: New evidence from Jordanian commercial banks

Zyad Marashdeh, Khaled Alzubi, Ammar Haikal
1 links
Risk Governance and Control Financial Markets & Institutions
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
article

Stress testing, credit risk, and bank performance: New evidence from Jordanian commercial banks

Zyad Marashdeh, Khaled Alzubi, Ammar Haikal
article en

Abstract

This study examines the relationships among stress testing, credit risk, bank capital, and bank profitability in 13 Jordanian commercial banks over 2010–2020. Using a balanced panel and a two-step system GMM estimator, the analysis addresses endogeneity, reverse causality, unobserved heterogeneity, and dynamic persistence in profitability. The results indicate that credit risk has a significant negative effect on profitability, while bank capital has a positive effect. Stress testing is negatively associated with profitability in the short run, consistent with higher compliance costs and more conservative lending, but it strengthens banks’ resilience through improved risk management and capital planning. The study contributes evidence from an emerging banking system by jointly examining stress testing, credit risk, and bank capital in a dynamic framework. The findings suggest that regulators and bank managers should strengthen stress-testing practices, maintain adequate capital buffers, and enhance credit-risk management to support financial resilience and sustainable bank performance.

Risk Governance and Control Financial Markets & InstitutionsVol. 16(3)
Hashemite University (JO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon