Functional Exercise Capacity and Respiratory Muscle Strength in Pre-COPD, PRISm, and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background and Objectives: Respiratory muscle strength and exercise capacity remain incompletely characterized in pre-COPD and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm). We compared respiratory pressures and functional exercise capacity across pre-COPD, PRISm, and COPD. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center cross-sectional study included 150 symptomatic adults (50 per group) and was registered as NCT06650150. Assessments included post-bronchodilator spirometry, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), dyspnoea, and two six-minute walk tests. Valid walking results were available for 148 participants. The registered primary outcome was MIP < 80% predicted. Group comparisons were supplemented by exploratory post hoc multinomial regression and a sensitivity analysis using sex-specific respiratory pressure cut-offs. Results: The proportion with MIP < 80% predicted did not differ significantly across pre-COPD, PRISm, and COPD (52.0%, 54.0%, and 56.0%; p = 0.923). Median percentage-predicted MIP (79.2%, 77.5%, and 77.1%; p = 0.881) and MEP (74.0%, 66.7%, and 65.8%; p = 0.289) also did not differ significantly. The post hoc cut-off analysis found no statistically significant group differences. Median percentage-predicted six-minute walk distance was lower in COPD (74.0%) than in pre-COPD (80.8%; adjusted p < 0.001) and PRISm (78.3%; adjusted p = 0.038). FEV1 and FEF25–75 differed overall (both p < 0.001). In exploratory regression, cumulative smoking exposure was associated with PRISm and COPD classification; the significance of age depended on model specification, and functional measures were not significantly associated with classification. Conclusions: The registered MIP outcome and continuous respiratory pressures did not differ significantly among the groups, whereas exercise capacity was lower in COPD. These findings do not establish equivalence or preserved respiratory muscle strength in any group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicina
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina62112071
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional Exercise Capacity and Respiratory Muscle Strength in Pre-COPD, PRISm, and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study

Burcu Camcıoğlu, Özlem Şengören Dikiş, Sabri Serhan Olcay, Utku Tapan et al.
Medicina
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
article

Functional Exercise Capacity and Respiratory Muscle Strength in Pre-COPD, PRISm, and COPD: A Cross-Sectional Study

Burcu Camcıoğlu, Özlem Şengören Dikiş, Sabri Serhan Olcay, Utku Tapan, Baki Umut Tuğay, Baris Kara, Merve Gurkan
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Respiratory muscle strength and exercise capacity remain incompletely characterized in pre-COPD and preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm). We compared respiratory pressures and functional exercise capacity across pre-COPD, PRISm, and COPD. Materials and Methods: This prospective single-center cross-sectional study included 150 symptomatic adults (50 per group) and was registered as NCT06650150. Assessments included post-bronchodilator spirometry, maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP), dyspnoea, and two six-minute walk tests. Valid walking results were available for 148 participants. The registered primary outcome was MIP < 80% predicted. Group comparisons were supplemented by exploratory post hoc multinomial regression and a sensitivity analysis using sex-specific respiratory pressure cut-offs. Results: The proportion with MIP < 80% predicted did not differ significantly across pre-COPD, PRISm, and COPD (52.0%, 54.0%, and 56.0%; p = 0.923). Median percentage-predicted MIP (79.2%, 77.5%, and 77.1%; p = 0.881) and MEP (74.0%, 66.7%, and 65.8%; p = 0.289) also did not differ significantly. The post hoc cut-off analysis found no statistically significant group differences. Median percentage-predicted six-minute walk distance was lower in COPD (74.0%) than in pre-COPD (80.8%; adjusted p < 0.001) and PRISm (78.3%; adjusted p = 0.038). FEV1 and FEF25–75 differed overall (both p < 0.001). In exploratory regression, cumulative smoking exposure was associated with PRISm and COPD classification; the significance of age depended on model specification, and functional measures were not significantly associated with classification. Conclusions: The registered MIP outcome and continuous respiratory pressures did not differ significantly among the groups, whereas exercise capacity was lower in COPD. These findings do not establish equivalence or preserved respiratory muscle strength in any group.

MedicinaVol. 62(11)
Düzce Üniversitesi (TR), Muğla University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon