Precision Perioperative Treatment for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives

The treatment paradigm for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to evolve toward precision perioperative strategies. Despite curative-intent surgery, disease recurrence remains common. Adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors have substantially improved disease-free survival and, in selected populations, overall survival, particularly for patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. Targeted therapies for other actionable genomic alterations (AGAs), including RET fusions, remain investigational. Adequate tissue acquisition and comprehensive molecular profiling before treatment initiation are therefore essential for optimal treatment selection. For patients without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements, neoadjuvant or perioperative PD-(L)1 blockade combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has become a standard of care for eligible patients with resectable stage II–III NSCLC, improving pathological response, event-free survival, and, in select trials, overall survival. Multidisciplinary reassessment of resectability following neoadjuvant treatment is particularly important for borderline-resectable disease. Patients subsequently deemed unresectable require individualized management, potentially including definitive chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation immunotherapy. Although cross-trial comparisons suggest advantages of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over adjuvant-only immunotherapy, direct randomized comparisons are lacking. The incremental benefit of postoperative immunotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy remains uncertain for selected patients. Future priorities include optimizing treatment sequencing, improving pathological complete response rates, refining radiographic and molecular response assessment, investigating resistance mechanisms, and integrating circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease detection into individualized postoperative treatment. Whether surgery can be safely omitted in exceptional responders also warrants prospective investigation. Together, these advances support a biomarker-driven, response-adapted approach to precision perioperative NSCLC management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18213456
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Precision Perioperative Treatment for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives

Luis A. Godoy, Dayna Jill Isaacs, Nicholas S. Stollenwerk, Prabhu Rajappa et al.
Cancers
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Precision Perioperative Treatment for Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Perspectives

Luis A. Godoy, Dayna Jill Isaacs, Nicholas S. Stollenwerk, Prabhu Rajappa, Tianhong Li, Ruqiang Liang, Dongguang Wei, C. Park, Linjun Zha, Kao Y. Chang
article en

Abstract

The treatment paradigm for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to evolve toward precision perioperative strategies. Despite curative-intent surgery, disease recurrence remains common. Adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors have substantially improved disease-free survival and, in selected populations, overall survival, particularly for patients with sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements. Targeted therapies for other actionable genomic alterations (AGAs), including RET fusions, remain investigational. Adequate tissue acquisition and comprehensive molecular profiling before treatment initiation are therefore essential for optimal treatment selection. For patients without sensitizing EGFR mutations or ALK rearrangements, neoadjuvant or perioperative PD-(L)1 blockade combined with platinum-based chemotherapy has become a standard of care for eligible patients with resectable stage II–III NSCLC, improving pathological response, event-free survival, and, in select trials, overall survival. Multidisciplinary reassessment of resectability following neoadjuvant treatment is particularly important for borderline-resectable disease. Patients subsequently deemed unresectable require individualized management, potentially including definitive chemoradiotherapy followed by consolidation immunotherapy. Although cross-trial comparisons suggest advantages of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy over adjuvant-only immunotherapy, direct randomized comparisons are lacking. The incremental benefit of postoperative immunotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy remains uncertain for selected patients. Future priorities include optimizing treatment sequencing, improving pathological complete response rates, refining radiographic and molecular response assessment, investigating resistance mechanisms, and integrating circulating tumor DNA-based minimal residual disease detection into individualized postoperative treatment. Whether surgery can be safely omitted in exceptional responders also warrants prospective investigation. Together, these advances support a biomarker-driven, response-adapted approach to precision perioperative NSCLC management.

CancersVol. 18(21)
United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US), VA Northern California Health Care System (US), University of California Davis Medical Center (US), University of California, Davis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon