What the test doesn’t measure: social justice and experiences of physical fitness assessment in physical education

Physical fitness (PF) assessment is a common practice in Physical Education (PE), often linked to performance measurement and student comparison, raising pedagogical and ethical concerns regarding equity and inclusion. Guided by Social Justice Theory, this qualitative study explored how students experience and make sense of PF assessment, focusing on emotions, learning processes, and perceptions of fairness. Sixteen students completed reflective journals over one academic term, complemented by semi-structured interviews and focus groups. A thematic analysis identified three central categories: (1) PF as pressure, (2) tests that do not promote learning, and (3) learning from oneself. Findings indicate that standardised fitness tests are associated with pressure, demotivation, and limited learning, whereas assessment approaches centred on self-regulation, individual progress, and bodily understanding are perceived as fairer and more educational. From a social justice perspective, the study highlights the need to rethink PF assessment towards more formative practices in PE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/25742981.2026.2753776
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What the test doesn’t measure: social justice and experiences of physical fitness assessment in physical education

Pedro Antonio Sánchez Miguel, David Hortigüela Alcalá, Bingen Marcos-Rivero, José Luis Álvarez-Sánchez
1 links
Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

What the test doesn’t measure: social justice and experiences of physical fitness assessment in physical education

Pedro Antonio Sánchez Miguel, David Hortigüela Alcalá, Bingen Marcos-Rivero, José Luis Álvarez-Sánchez
article en

Abstract

Physical fitness (PF) assessment is a common practice in Physical Education (PE), often linked to performance measurement and student comparison, raising pedagogical and ethical concerns regarding equity and inclusion. Guided by Social Justice Theory, this qualitative study explored how students experience and make sense of PF assessment, focusing on emotions, learning processes, and perceptions of fairness. Sixteen students completed reflective journals over one academic term, complemented by semi-structured interviews and focus groups. A thematic analysis identified three central categories: (1) PF as pressure, (2) tests that do not promote learning, and (3) learning from oneself. Findings indicate that standardised fitness tests are associated with pressure, demotivation, and limited learning, whereas assessment approaches centred on self-regulation, individual progress, and bodily understanding are perceived as fairer and more educational. From a social justice perspective, the study highlights the need to rethink PF assessment towards more formative practices in PE.

Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education
University of the Basque Country (ES), Universidad de Burgos (ES), Universidad de Extremadura (ES), Universidad de León (ES)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
What the test doesn’t measure: social justice and experiences of physical fitness assessment in physical education — Pedro Antonio Sánchez Miguel, David Hortigüela Alcalá, et al. · Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS