RAGing Against Misogyny: Improving Implicit Misogyny Explanations

Implicit misogyny often requires background knowledge to be understood. To address this challenge, we propose a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework for detecting and explaining implicit misogyny in English and Italian, leveraging encyclopedic, slang and feminist knowledge sources. Using the ImplicIT-Mis and SBIC+ datasets, we evaluate the contribution of each knowledge source to detection and explanation quality, investigating also whether RAG addresses known LLM failure modes in implicit misogyny. Results show that RAG improves recall on ImplicIT-Mis, but does not improve detection performance on SBIC+. However, human evaluation shows that RAG-based explanations are preferred over no-RAG explanations in both languages. Feminist literature emerges as the most consistently useful source for detection and explanation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.35094
Primary Topic
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

RAGing Against Misogyny: Improving Implicit Misogyny Explanations

Maarten Sap, Debora Nozza, Tommaso Caselli, Arianna Muti et al.
arXiv (Cornell University)
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
preprint

RAGing Against Misogyny: Improving Implicit Misogyny Explanations

Maarten Sap, Debora Nozza, Tommaso Caselli, Arianna Muti, Ivana Crescenzi
preprint en

Abstract

Implicit misogyny often requires background knowledge to be understood. To address this challenge, we propose a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) framework for detecting and explaining implicit misogyny in English and Italian, leveraging encyclopedic, slang and feminist knowledge sources. Using the ImplicIT-Mis and SBIC+ datasets, we evaluate the contribution of each knowledge source to detection and explanation quality, investigating also whether RAG addresses known LLM failure modes in implicit misogyny. Results show that RAG improves recall on ImplicIT-Mis, but does not improve detection performance on SBIC+. However, human evaluation shows that RAG-based explanations are preferred over no-RAG explanations in both languages. Feminist literature emerges as the most consistently useful source for detection and explanation.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon