Pragmatic functions of pray and prithee as discourse markers in Early Modern English

The paper investigates the pragmatic functions of the Early Modern English discourse markers pray and prithee. In the domain of historical politeness, it is suggested that pray worked primarily as a deference indicator, marking negative politeness, and prithee was used to display positive politeness as an in-group identity and solidarity marker. However, after examining the compilation of The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, which comprises all 37 Shakespeare’s plays, this paper argues that the pragmatic functionality of both discourse markers was far more complex than previously assumed. The data supply evidence of functional overlap and other pragmatic functions of the discourse markers. The current study suggests that the choice between the two discourse markers was a highly context-dependent dynamic, pragmatic phenomenon that was not fully predicated on the sociolinguistic stratification of the era.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studia Neophilologica
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2026.2660673
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic functions of pray and prithee as discourse markers in Early Modern English

Daniel Edward Szpotanski
Studia Neophilologica
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Pragmatic functions of pray and prithee as discourse markers in Early Modern English

Daniel Edward Szpotanski
article en

Abstract

The paper investigates the pragmatic functions of the Early Modern English discourse markers pray and prithee. In the domain of historical politeness, it is suggested that pray worked primarily as a deference indicator, marking negative politeness, and prithee was used to display positive politeness as an in-group identity and solidarity marker. However, after examining the compilation of The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, which comprises all 37 Shakespeare’s plays, this paper argues that the pragmatic functionality of both discourse markers was far more complex than previously assumed. The data supply evidence of functional overlap and other pragmatic functions of the discourse markers. The current study suggests that the choice between the two discourse markers was a highly context-dependent dynamic, pragmatic phenomenon that was not fully predicated on the sociolinguistic stratification of the era.

Studia Neophilologica
Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon