Characterization of heterogeneous bioinformatics training needs in the AI era

Bioinformatics training providers serve heterogeneous audiences, a challenge sharpened by fast-evolving technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI). Analyzing training-needs surveys in aggregate can mask this heterogeneity. We present a network-based clustering protocol that groups respondents by the similarity of their Likert-type topic ratings: respondents form a Spearman correlation network, and community detection groups them into learner profiles with shared training needs, independent of demographics. We demonstrate the protocol on the 2026 SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) training needs survey (n=260), covering topics, barriers, and formats. We identified four interpretable learner profiles: AI and data, infectious disease genomics, functional genomics, and biochemistry, imaging & AI. Each had distinct topic priorities, barriers, and format preferences that an aggregate analysis hides. For example, LLM-based knowledge extraction ranked 2nd overall but only 16th in the infectious disease genomics profile, whereas phylogenetics ranked 17th overall but first there. Across profiles, AI/LLM skills and reproducible data practices were in high demand, whereas AI-assisted learning was, unexpectedly, the least preferred format. Because the protocol requires only a shared Likert scale, it is reusable for other training-needs assessments; the implementation is openly available. Profile-based curricula can target each group's topics, formats, and barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.22.761024
Primary Topic
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Characterization of heterogeneous bioinformatics training needs in the AI era

Grégoire Rossier, Deepak K. Tanwar, Patricia M. Palagi, Monique Zahn‐Zabal et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
preprint

Characterization of heterogeneous bioinformatics training needs in the AI era

Grégoire Rossier, Deepak K. Tanwar, Patricia M. Palagi, Monique Zahn‐Zabal, Wandrille Duchemin, Joana Carlevaro-Fita, Valeria Di Cola, Geert van Geest, Diana Marek, Marion Vaucher
preprint en

Abstract

Bioinformatics training providers serve heterogeneous audiences, a challenge sharpened by fast-evolving technologies such as generative artificial intelligence (AI). Analyzing training-needs surveys in aggregate can mask this heterogeneity. We present a network-based clustering protocol that groups respondents by the similarity of their Likert-type topic ratings: respondents form a Spearman correlation network, and community detection groups them into learner profiles with shared training needs, independent of demographics. We demonstrate the protocol on the 2026 SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (SIB) training needs survey (n=260), covering topics, barriers, and formats. We identified four interpretable learner profiles: AI and data, infectious disease genomics, functional genomics, and biochemistry, imaging & AI. Each had distinct topic priorities, barriers, and format preferences that an aggregate analysis hides. For example, LLM-based knowledge extraction ranked 2nd overall but only 16th in the infectious disease genomics profile, whereas phylogenetics ranked 17th overall but first there. Across profiles, AI/LLM skills and reproducible data practices were in high demand, whereas AI-assisted learning was, unexpectedly, the least preferred format. Because the protocol requires only a shared Likert scale, it is reusable for other training-needs assessments; the implementation is openly available. Profile-based curricula can target each group's topics, formats, and barriers.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon