Joint Datum–Form Decomposition for Photogrammetric Acceptance of Large Precision Assemblies

Digital industrial photogrammetry is used for acceptance of large precision assemblies, but separating the time-invariant assembly form error from the epoch-varying measurement perturbation remains challenging. Registering each repeat independently to CAD with a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) datum from only a few control points absorbs part of the form error, biasing the assembly RMS. This article proposes joint datum–form decomposition (JDFD), a generalised Procrustes analysis that shares one CAD-anchored common rigid across repeats and removes each epoch’s residual whole-body similarity. JDFD offers two advantages. First, its assembly RMS is independent of the sparse-control budget: an independent per-epoch 6-DoF overestimates the assembly RMS by ≈43% in Monte Carlo (σM=6.0 μm) and by ≈79% on real data at nc=4 (median ≈ 51% over random layouts), whereas JDFD returns the full-set reference RMS(I^)=11.92 μm at every nc tested. Second, by removing residual similarity, JDFD yields an uncontaminated within-session perturbation RMS(M^)=3.36 μm, compared with 5.57 μm without peeling and 3.91 μm against the full-set independent-datum baseline. The resulting assembly RMS exceeds the 10 μm specification, so acceptance should rest on the nc-invariant RMS(I^).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26216761
Primary Topic
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Joint Datum–Form Decomposition for Photogrammetric Acceptance of Large Precision Assemblies

Yinggang Guo
Sensors
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
article

Joint Datum–Form Decomposition for Photogrammetric Acceptance of Large Precision Assemblies

Yinggang Guo
article en

Abstract

Digital industrial photogrammetry is used for acceptance of large precision assemblies, but separating the time-invariant assembly form error from the epoch-varying measurement perturbation remains challenging. Registering each repeat independently to CAD with a six-degree-of-freedom (6-DoF) datum from only a few control points absorbs part of the form error, biasing the assembly RMS. This article proposes joint datum–form decomposition (JDFD), a generalised Procrustes analysis that shares one CAD-anchored common rigid across repeats and removes each epoch’s residual whole-body similarity. JDFD offers two advantages. First, its assembly RMS is independent of the sparse-control budget: an independent per-epoch 6-DoF overestimates the assembly RMS by ≈43% in Monte Carlo (σM=6.0 μm) and by ≈79% on real data at nc=4 (median ≈ 51% over random layouts), whereas JDFD returns the full-set reference RMS(I^)=11.92 μm at every nc tested. Second, by removing residual similarity, JDFD yields an uncontaminated within-session perturbation RMS(M^)=3.36 μm, compared with 5.57 μm without peeling and 3.91 μm against the full-set independent-datum baseline. The resulting assembly RMS exceeds the 10 μm specification, so acceptance should rest on the nc-invariant RMS(I^).

SensorsVol. 26(21)
Northwest Institute of Nuclear Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Advanced Measurement and Metrology Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Joint Datum–Form Decomposition for Photogrammetric Acceptance of Large Precision Assemblies — Yinggang Guo · Sensors (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS