Experimental study on performance and durability of Guangzhou soft soil solidified by a new slag-fly ash based cementitious material

The development of sustainable alternatives to Portland cement for soft soil stabilization is of great significance for reducing carbon emissions and enhancing infrastructure longevity. This study investigates a one-part slag-fly ash geopolymer binder containing solid sodium silicate for stabilizing Guangzhou soft clay. The optimal mix proportion was a slag-to-fly ash ratio of 90:10, a solid activator dosage of 14% relative to the precursor mass, and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.6, achieving a 28-day compressive strength of 2.01 MPa, 14.9% higher than the pure slag system. After 25 wetting-drying cycles, the geopolymer showed a strength loss of 6.5%, compared with 31.2% for cement. After 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the losses were 34.8% and 36.5%, respectively. After 100 days of sulfate immersion, the losses were 32.3% and 44.2%. Under the coupled sulfate immersion-drying-freeze-thaw protocol, the geopolymer remained intact after 100 cycles with a 47.3% strength loss, whereas the cement-treated soil disintegrated. SEM showed qualitative differences in apparent matrix continuity, visible voids, and particle morphology among the mixtures; morphology alone did not establish phase identity or a definitive damage mechanism. The results indicate that this one-part binder can improve the measured strength and durability of Guangzhou soft clay under the tested conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-76808-y
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental study on performance and durability of Guangzhou soft soil solidified by a new slag-fly ash based cementitious material

Houzan Huang, Liang Zhu, Jiaming Huang, Fei Yang et al.
1 links
Scientific Reports
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
article

Experimental study on performance and durability of Guangzhou soft soil solidified by a new slag-fly ash based cementitious material

Houzan Huang, Liang Zhu, Jiaming Huang, Fei Yang, Longfei Wu, Yang Liu
article en

Abstract

The development of sustainable alternatives to Portland cement for soft soil stabilization is of great significance for reducing carbon emissions and enhancing infrastructure longevity. This study investigates a one-part slag-fly ash geopolymer binder containing solid sodium silicate for stabilizing Guangzhou soft clay. The optimal mix proportion was a slag-to-fly ash ratio of 90:10, a solid activator dosage of 14% relative to the precursor mass, and a water-to-binder ratio of 0.6, achieving a 28-day compressive strength of 2.01 MPa, 14.9% higher than the pure slag system. After 25 wetting-drying cycles, the geopolymer showed a strength loss of 6.5%, compared with 31.2% for cement. After 100 freeze-thaw cycles, the losses were 34.8% and 36.5%, respectively. After 100 days of sulfate immersion, the losses were 32.3% and 44.2%. Under the coupled sulfate immersion-drying-freeze-thaw protocol, the geopolymer remained intact after 100 cycles with a 47.3% strength loss, whereas the cement-treated soil disintegrated. SEM showed qualitative differences in apparent matrix continuity, visible voids, and particle morphology among the mixtures; morphology alone did not establish phase identity or a definitive damage mechanism. The results indicate that this one-part binder can improve the measured strength and durability of Guangzhou soft clay under the tested conditions.

Scientific Reports
Guangzhou Urban Planning Survey & Design Institute (CN), Guangdong Province Environmental Monitoring Center (CN), Early Warning (United States) (US)
Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon