Photobiomodulation versus stabilization splint, both combined with self-management, for acute temporomandibular myalgia: 48-week outcomes of a partially randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND: Photobiomodulation (LLLT) is used for myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD), but longer-term comparative evidence versus stabilization splints alongside structured self-management remains limited. This study aims to compare pain reduction and maximum painless mouth opening after photobiomodulation+self-management (PBM + SM) versus stabilization splint+self-management (OS + SM), with an additional self-management-only comparator (SM), over 48 weeks. METHODS: This partially randomized controlled study enrolled 66 patients with DC/TMD-diagnosed acute masticatory muscle pain. Forty-four participants consenting to intervention were randomized 1:1 to PBM + SM (660-nm diode laser, twice weekly, 10 sessions) or OS + SM (maxillary stabilization splint worn at night, 8 h/day for 2 months). Both intervention groups received the same SM programme (education, habit modification, and jaw exercises for 2 months). A non-randomized convenience group received SM alone (n = 22). Assessments were performed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48. Primary outcomes were VAS pain (0-10) and maximum painless mouth opening (MPMO, mm). Secondary outcomes included masticatory muscle tenderness and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Longitudinal analyses used linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: All groups improved over time, with earlier improvement in both intervention arms. In the randomized comparison, PBM + SM and OS + SM showed comparable week-48 outcomes for VAS pain and MPMO. No significant between-group difference in masticatory muscle tender points was observed at week 48 after Holm adjustment. Comparisons involving the SM-only group were exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: Over 48 weeks, PBM + SM and OS + SM produced comparable improvements in pain and maximum painless mouth opening, with no significant between-group difference in masticatory muscle tender points at week 48. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06419738.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360472
Primary Topic
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Photobiomodulation versus stabilization splint, both combined with self-management, for acute temporomandibular myalgia: 48-week outcomes of a partially randomized controlled study

Nguyen Ngoc Hoa, Tran Thai Binh, To Thanh Dong, Tran Thi Minh Quyen et al.
2 links
PLoS ONE
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
article

Photobiomodulation versus stabilization splint, both combined with self-management, for acute temporomandibular myalgia: 48-week outcomes of a partially randomized controlled study

Nguyen Ngoc Hoa, Tran Thai Binh, To Thanh Dong, Tran Thi Minh Quyen, Viet Hai Hoang, Toan Do
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Photobiomodulation (LLLT) is used for myogenous temporomandibular disorders (TMD), but longer-term comparative evidence versus stabilization splints alongside structured self-management remains limited. This study aims to compare pain reduction and maximum painless mouth opening after photobiomodulation+self-management (PBM + SM) versus stabilization splint+self-management (OS + SM), with an additional self-management-only comparator (SM), over 48 weeks. METHODS: This partially randomized controlled study enrolled 66 patients with DC/TMD-diagnosed acute masticatory muscle pain. Forty-four participants consenting to intervention were randomized 1:1 to PBM + SM (660-nm diode laser, twice weekly, 10 sessions) or OS + SM (maxillary stabilization splint worn at night, 8 h/day for 2 months). Both intervention groups received the same SM programme (education, habit modification, and jaw exercises for 2 months). A non-randomized convenience group received SM alone (n = 22). Assessments were performed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 12, 24, and 48. Primary outcomes were VAS pain (0-10) and maximum painless mouth opening (MPMO, mm). Secondary outcomes included masticatory muscle tenderness and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Longitudinal analyses used linear mixed-effects models. RESULTS: All groups improved over time, with earlier improvement in both intervention arms. In the randomized comparison, PBM + SM and OS + SM showed comparable week-48 outcomes for VAS pain and MPMO. No significant between-group difference in masticatory muscle tender points was observed at week 48 after Holm adjustment. Comparisons involving the SM-only group were exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: Over 48 weeks, PBM + SM and OS + SM produced comparable improvements in pain and maximum painless mouth opening, with no significant between-group difference in masticatory muscle tender points at week 48. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06419738.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Hanoi Medical University (VN), 108 Military Central Hospital (VN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon