Sustainability comparison of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and pure machining using LCA, environmental prices and cost analysis: a case study on a low carbon steel pipe reducer

Abstract Manufacturing complex steel components by pure machining generates substantial material waste and requires considerable energy, motivating a shift toward near net shape technologies. Although Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) is a promising alternative, the literature lacks integrated, high fidelity assessments that address the economic and environmental uncertainties associated with industrial adoption. This study compares WAAM with pure machining for a low carbon steel eccentric pipe reducer measuring 77 mm in lower diameter, 73 mm in height, and 40 mm in upper diameter. The assessment integrates a cradle to gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) based on ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) and Endpoint (H), Environmental Prices to monetize external societal costs in a single monetary score, Life Cycle Costing (LCC) to evaluate economic feasibility, and Monte Carlo simulation to assess uncertainty. WAAM reduced material waste by 61%, water consumption by 60%, and global warming potential by 45%. It also reduced impacts in eight other categories, including land use by 89% and marine eutrophication by 92%. However, WAAM increased fine particulate matter formation by 33% and terrestrial ecotoxicity by 88%, indicating a need for targeted fume management. Environmental Prices showed that WAAM reduced external societal costs by 10%, from 1.72 to 1.55 USD per unit. At the reference condition of 500 FU per year and ten substrate reuse cycles, WAAM achieved an approximately 6% deterministic operating cost advantage. The Monte Carlo simulation for 500 FU also indicated a narrower 90% confidence interval for WAAM, from 1551 to 1862 USD, than for machining, from 1490 to 2061 USD. These findings indicate that WAAM is a technically feasible option with substantial environmental benefits and potential operating cost advantages for the investigated component.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Research Express
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-8695/aeba3c
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sustainability comparison of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and pure machining using LCA, environmental prices and cost analysis: a case study on a low carbon steel pipe reducer

Farhad Kolahan, Mohammad Mahdi Tavallaei, Mahdi Mazloom Farsibaf, Amirmohammad Ghandehariun et al.
3 links
Engineering Research Express
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Sustainability comparison of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) and pure machining using LCA, environmental prices and cost analysis: a case study on a low carbon steel pipe reducer

Farhad Kolahan, Mohammad Mahdi Tavallaei, Mahdi Mazloom Farsibaf, Amirmohammad Ghandehariun, Hossein Feiz Arefy
article en

Abstract

Abstract Manufacturing complex steel components by pure machining generates substantial material waste and requires considerable energy, motivating a shift toward near net shape technologies. Although Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) is a promising alternative, the literature lacks integrated, high fidelity assessments that address the economic and environmental uncertainties associated with industrial adoption. This study compares WAAM with pure machining for a low carbon steel eccentric pipe reducer measuring 77 mm in lower diameter, 73 mm in height, and 40 mm in upper diameter. The assessment integrates a cradle to gate Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) based on ReCiPe 2016 Midpoint (H) and Endpoint (H), Environmental Prices to monetize external societal costs in a single monetary score, Life Cycle Costing (LCC) to evaluate economic feasibility, and Monte Carlo simulation to assess uncertainty. WAAM reduced material waste by 61%, water consumption by 60%, and global warming potential by 45%. It also reduced impacts in eight other categories, including land use by 89% and marine eutrophication by 92%. However, WAAM increased fine particulate matter formation by 33% and terrestrial ecotoxicity by 88%, indicating a need for targeted fume management. Environmental Prices showed that WAAM reduced external societal costs by 10%, from 1.72 to 1.55 USD per unit. At the reference condition of 500 FU per year and ten substrate reuse cycles, WAAM achieved an approximately 6% deterministic operating cost advantage. The Monte Carlo simulation for 500 FU also indicated a narrower 90% confidence interval for WAAM, from 1551 to 1862 USD, than for machining, from 1490 to 2061 USD. These findings indicate that WAAM is a technically feasible option with substantial environmental benefits and potential operating cost advantages for the investigated component.

Engineering Research Express
Tarbiat Modares University (IR), Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (IR)
Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon