Fetal and neonatal outcomes in planned versus unplanned pregnancies in people with spina bifida

Introduction There is limited information on the impact of pregnancy planning on neonatal outcomes in people with spina bifida (SB). Methods This study is a sub-group analysis of The Spina Bifida Reproductive Health and Pregnancy Study, an online international cross-sectional survey. Pregnancy, birth and neonatal data were assessed using descriptive and chi-squared analyses. Results A total of 209 pregnancies were included: 108 planned and 101 unplanned. The unplanned group included a greater risk of miscarriage/ectopic pregnancy (30%), unplanned fetal loss (34%), intrauterine growth restriction less than 5th percentile (16%) and babies with congenital anomalies. There was no statistically significant difference between unplanned and planned pregnancies in terms of admission to neonatal intensive care unit or risk of preterm birth. Conclusion People with SB have rates of unplanned pregnancy similar to the general population. Unplanned pregnancies appear to have increased fetal and neonatal risks. Findings suggest that pregnancy planning is a modifiable factor, which may improve outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetric Medicine
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/1753495x261490378
Primary Topic
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fetal and neonatal outcomes in planned versus unplanned pregnancies in people with spina bifida

Paige Church, Georgia Condran, Asia L. van Buuren, Anne Berndl et al.
Obstetric Medicine
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
article

Fetal and neonatal outcomes in planned versus unplanned pregnancies in people with spina bifida

Paige Church, Georgia Condran, Asia L. van Buuren, Anne Berndl, Julia Kfouri
article en

Abstract

Introduction There is limited information on the impact of pregnancy planning on neonatal outcomes in people with spina bifida (SB). Methods This study is a sub-group analysis of The Spina Bifida Reproductive Health and Pregnancy Study, an online international cross-sectional survey. Pregnancy, birth and neonatal data were assessed using descriptive and chi-squared analyses. Results A total of 209 pregnancies were included: 108 planned and 101 unplanned. The unplanned group included a greater risk of miscarriage/ectopic pregnancy (30%), unplanned fetal loss (34%), intrauterine growth restriction less than 5th percentile (16%) and babies with congenital anomalies. There was no statistically significant difference between unplanned and planned pregnancies in terms of admission to neonatal intensive care unit or risk of preterm birth. Conclusion People with SB have rates of unplanned pregnancy similar to the general population. Unplanned pregnancies appear to have increased fetal and neonatal risks. Findings suggest that pregnancy planning is a modifiable factor, which may improve outcomes.

Obstetric Medicine
Boston Children's Hospital (US), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon