The Road Not Taken: Stephen Toulmin and a Failed Practice-Turn in Mid-Twentieth Century Philosophy of Science

Abstract The “turn to practice” in philosophy of science is generally thought to have begun in the 1980s, exemplified by the work of the “new experimentalists” like Ian Hacking. But this was not— as some have claimed— the first work in philosophy of science to advocate explicitly and self-consciously for a turn to practice. That work appeared three decades earlier, and owed its largest debt to the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Misleadingly titled The Philosophy of Science: An Introduction, the book was Stephen Toulmin’s attempt to reorient philosophy of science around a different set of themes than those that prevailed in the 1950s. In this paper, I reconstruct some key features of Toulmin’s early philosophy with the aim of exhibiting the comprehensive influence of the later Wittgenstein. I argue that the main utility of this exercise is to draw attention to an unrealized possibility— a road not taken in twentieth century philosophy of science, but that might still be explored with profit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives on Science
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1162/posc.a.596
Primary Topic
Philosophy, Science, and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Road Not Taken: Stephen Toulmin and a Failed Practice-Turn in Mid-Twentieth Century Philosophy of Science

Max W. Dresow
Perspectives on Science
Philosophy, Science, and History
article

The Road Not Taken: Stephen Toulmin and a Failed Practice-Turn in Mid-Twentieth Century Philosophy of Science

Max W. Dresow
article en

Abstract

Abstract The “turn to practice” in philosophy of science is generally thought to have begun in the 1980s, exemplified by the work of the “new experimentalists” like Ian Hacking. But this was not— as some have claimed— the first work in philosophy of science to advocate explicitly and self-consciously for a turn to practice. That work appeared three decades earlier, and owed its largest debt to the philosophy of Ludwig Wittgenstein. Misleadingly titled The Philosophy of Science: An Introduction, the book was Stephen Toulmin’s attempt to reorient philosophy of science around a different set of themes than those that prevailed in the 1950s. In this paper, I reconstruct some key features of Toulmin’s early philosophy with the aim of exhibiting the comprehensive influence of the later Wittgenstein. I argue that the main utility of this exercise is to draw attention to an unrealized possibility— a road not taken in twentieth century philosophy of science, but that might still be explored with profit.

Perspectives on Science
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Philosophy, Science, and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon