Explainable Machine Learning for Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction: Evidence from Accounting Information

Bankruptcy prediction sits at the core of credit risk management, yet the ML models now used for it are seldom examined for interpretability. This paper benchmarks five classifiers — Logistic Regression, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and a Neural Network — on 78,682 firm-year records of U.S. public companies from 1999 to 2018. Boruta selection screens 36 raw items and accounting ratios down to the informative ones, and class imbalance is tackled with cost-sensitive learning plus a Youden's J threshold. XGBoost attains the highest test AUC (0.8343), trailed by ANN (0.8255) and KNN (0.8149). Retained earnings ratio, market-to-assets, and EBIT emerge from SHAP as the strongest predictors. Across pre-crisis (1999–2006), crisis (2007–2009), and post-crisis (2010–2011) windows, the relative importance of these indicators stays largely unchanged, with retained earnings leading in every period. By pairing strong predictive accuracy with explainable evidence, the study narrows the gap between black-box performance and the transparency expected by lenders and regulators. The resulting framework acts as an auditable early-warning tool that practitioners can both trust and interrogate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.bh38229
Primary Topic
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Explainable Machine Learning for Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction: Evidence from Accounting Information

Ziqi Zhao
2 links
Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
article

Explainable Machine Learning for Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction: Evidence from Accounting Information

Ziqi Zhao
article en

Abstract

Bankruptcy prediction sits at the core of credit risk management, yet the ML models now used for it are seldom examined for interpretability. This paper benchmarks five classifiers — Logistic Regression, XGBoost, Support Vector Machine, K-Nearest Neighbors, and a Neural Network — on 78,682 firm-year records of U.S. public companies from 1999 to 2018. Boruta selection screens 36 raw items and accounting ratios down to the informative ones, and class imbalance is tackled with cost-sensitive learning plus a Youden's J threshold. XGBoost attains the highest test AUC (0.8343), trailed by ANN (0.8255) and KNN (0.8149). Retained earnings ratio, market-to-assets, and EBIT emerge from SHAP as the strongest predictors. Across pre-crisis (1999–2006), crisis (2007–2009), and post-crisis (2010–2011) windows, the relative importance of these indicators stays largely unchanged, with retained earnings leading in every period. By pairing strong predictive accuracy with explainable evidence, the study narrows the gap between black-box performance and the transparency expected by lenders and regulators. The resulting framework acts as an auditable early-warning tool that practitioners can both trust and interrogate.

Advances in Economics Management and Political SciencesVol. 311(1)
Tianjin Foreign Studies University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Financial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Explainable Machine Learning for Corporate Bankruptcy Prediction: Evidence from Accounting Information — Ziqi Zhao · Advances in Economics Management and Political Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS