Ultrasound-guided versus laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial

Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided and laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 60 adults undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received either ultrasound-guided (US-TAP, n = 30) or laparoscopic-assisted (L-TAP, n = 30) subcostal TAP block under standardized general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain intensity on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) across the first 24 postoperative hours; comparisons at individual time points were exploratory. Secondary outcomes were analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, rescue opioid requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to ambulation, length of stay, and complications.Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable; pain scores declined over time in both groups. NRS scores were lower with US-TAP at 1 hour (2.50 ± 1.72 vs 4.03 ± 1.56; difference 1.53, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.38; p = 0.001) and 6 hours (1.83 ± 1.44 vs 2.70 ± 1.47; difference 0.87, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.62; p = 0.015), with no differences at the other six time points. No differences were found in time to first analgesic request, rescue analgesic or opioid requirements, PONV, ambulation, hospital stay, complications, or the overall 24-hour reduction in NRS.Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores, but these differences fell below commonly cited thresholds for clinically important change and were not accompanied by differences in analgesic requirements or recovery outcomes. Without a no-block control group and not being designed to test equivalence, this trial compares the two techniques rather than establishing the efficacy of either.Trial Registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT07352189). Registration was retrospective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20528/cjpm.2026.1293
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasound-guided versus laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial

Talat Ercan Şerifsoy, Berfin Gizem Özelsel
1 links
Challenge Journal of Perioperative Medicine
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Ultrasound-guided versus laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A prospective randomized trial

Talat Ercan Şerifsoy, Berfin Gizem Özelsel
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided and laparoscopic-assisted subcostal transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Methods: In this prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 60 adults undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received either ultrasound-guided (US-TAP, n = 30) or laparoscopic-assisted (L-TAP, n = 30) subcostal TAP block under standardized general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia. The primary outcome was pain intensity on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) across the first 24 postoperative hours; comparisons at individual time points were exploratory. Secondary outcomes were analgesic consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, rescue opioid requirement, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), time to ambulation, length of stay, and complications.Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable; pain scores declined over time in both groups. NRS scores were lower with US-TAP at 1 hour (2.50 ± 1.72 vs 4.03 ± 1.56; difference 1.53, 95% CI 0.68 to 2.38; p = 0.001) and 6 hours (1.83 ± 1.44 vs 2.70 ± 1.47; difference 0.87, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.62; p = 0.015), with no differences at the other six time points. No differences were found in time to first analgesic request, rescue analgesic or opioid requirements, PONV, ambulation, hospital stay, complications, or the overall 24-hour reduction in NRS.Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance was associated with lower early postoperative pain scores, but these differences fell below commonly cited thresholds for clinically important change and were not accompanied by differences in analgesic requirements or recovery outcomes. Without a no-block control group and not being designed to test equivalence, this trial compares the two techniques rather than establishing the efficacy of either.Trial Registration: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT07352189). Registration was retrospective.

Challenge Journal of Perioperative MedicineVol. 4(3)
Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği (TR), Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Maltepe University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon