Digital hauntings: Spectral demands and the politics of war memory on YouTube

Digital platforms transform how traumatic pasts circulate across temporal and cultural distance, yet existing frameworks do not explain why some circulating memory generates demands for historical accountability while other memory, equally visible and emotionally resonant, produces only grief. This article develops the concept of “digital haunting” to address this gap, distinguishing mobilized haunting, in which discourse communities sustain demands for justice through “failed mourning,” from domesticated haunting, which absorbs emotional engagement into heritage and private grief. A matched comparison of two Philippine documentaries on Japanese wartime atrocities, drawing on 1024 YouTube comments, shows the comfort women documentary generating demand-articulating comments at over four times the rate of the Manila massacre documentary despite shared production and platform conditions. The divergence tracks the structural ecology surrounding each reception: advocacy infrastructure, contemporary flashpoints, transnational solidarity networks, and the singularity or diffusion of responsibility. The evidence suggests that domestication is the default tendency of platform circulation, and that mobilized haunting depends on scaffolding built beyond it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Media War & Conflict
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506352261492211
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital hauntings: Spectral demands and the politics of war memory on YouTube

John Lee Candelaria
1 links
Media War & Conflict
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Digital hauntings: Spectral demands and the politics of war memory on YouTube

John Lee Candelaria
article en

Abstract

Digital platforms transform how traumatic pasts circulate across temporal and cultural distance, yet existing frameworks do not explain why some circulating memory generates demands for historical accountability while other memory, equally visible and emotionally resonant, produces only grief. This article develops the concept of “digital haunting” to address this gap, distinguishing mobilized haunting, in which discourse communities sustain demands for justice through “failed mourning,” from domesticated haunting, which absorbs emotional engagement into heritage and private grief. A matched comparison of two Philippine documentaries on Japanese wartime atrocities, drawing on 1024 YouTube comments, shows the comfort women documentary generating demand-articulating comments at over four times the rate of the Manila massacre documentary despite shared production and platform conditions. The divergence tracks the structural ecology surrounding each reception: advocacy infrastructure, contemporary flashpoints, transnational solidarity networks, and the singularity or diffusion of responsibility. The evidence suggests that domestication is the default tendency of platform circulation, and that mobilized haunting depends on scaffolding built beyond it.

Media War & Conflict
Hiroshima University (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon