A Bilayer Is Not a Lineage: Testing Myoepithelial Mimicry in EWSR1::BEND2-Fused Fenestrating Adenocarcinoma

Fenestrating adenocarcinoma is an emerging EWSR1::BEND2-associated malignancy of the pharyngeal region whose reported architectural diversity includes apparently biphasic arrangements, basal/squamoid differentiation and hyalinised pseudorosettes. These observations expose a specific diagnostic uncertainty: does apparent epithelial–myoepithelial organisation represent genuine neoplastic myoepithelial differentiation, or can it arise through basal/squamoid mimicry or incorporation of native glandular structures? The distinction remains unresolved because the published cases have not undergone a uniform, compartment-resolved assessment of cellular differentiation and neoplastic membership. This Perspective proposes a three-gate pathological framework separating anatomical compartment identification, differentiation assignment and molecular attribution of neoplastic identity. Four competing explanations are considered: genuine biphasic differentiation, basal/squamoid mimicry, non-neoplastic glandular entrapment and regional phenotypic heterogeneity. Serial-section morphology, spatially registered complementary immunohistochemistry and, where feasible, compartment-directed fusion analysis could discriminate among these possibilities. Neither p63/p40 expression nor individual negative myoepithelial markers independently determine lineage; similarly, a shared EWSR1::BEND2 fusion establishes molecular relatedness without proving differentiation. Reproducible demonstration of a distinct, fusion-associated abluminal population with coherent myoepithelial differentiation would challenge the proposed mimicry explanation. The immediate significance is diagnostic: apparent bilayering in a rare pharyngeal carcinoma must not automatically establish epithelial–myoepithelial carcinoma or another recognised biphasic neoplasm. The framework offers a falsifiable approach to refining tumour characterisation without prematurely modifying classification or clinical management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202610.2451.v1
Primary Topic
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Bilayer Is Not a Lineage: Testing Myoepithelial Mimicry in EWSR1::BEND2-Fused Fenestrating Adenocarcinoma

Birupaksha Biswas
Preprints.org
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
preprint

A Bilayer Is Not a Lineage: Testing Myoepithelial Mimicry in EWSR1::BEND2-Fused Fenestrating Adenocarcinoma

Birupaksha Biswas
preprint en

Abstract

Fenestrating adenocarcinoma is an emerging EWSR1::BEND2-associated malignancy of the pharyngeal region whose reported architectural diversity includes apparently biphasic arrangements, basal/squamoid differentiation and hyalinised pseudorosettes. These observations expose a specific diagnostic uncertainty: does apparent epithelial–myoepithelial organisation represent genuine neoplastic myoepithelial differentiation, or can it arise through basal/squamoid mimicry or incorporation of native glandular structures? The distinction remains unresolved because the published cases have not undergone a uniform, compartment-resolved assessment of cellular differentiation and neoplastic membership. This Perspective proposes a three-gate pathological framework separating anatomical compartment identification, differentiation assignment and molecular attribution of neoplastic identity. Four competing explanations are considered: genuine biphasic differentiation, basal/squamoid mimicry, non-neoplastic glandular entrapment and regional phenotypic heterogeneity. Serial-section morphology, spatially registered complementary immunohistochemistry and, where feasible, compartment-directed fusion analysis could discriminate among these possibilities. Neither p63/p40 expression nor individual negative myoepithelial markers independently determine lineage; similarly, a shared EWSR1::BEND2 fusion establishes molecular relatedness without proving differentiation. Reproducible demonstration of a distinct, fusion-associated abluminal population with coherent myoepithelial differentiation would challenge the proposed mimicry explanation. The immediate significance is diagnostic: apparent bilayering in a rare pharyngeal carcinoma must not automatically establish epithelial–myoepithelial carcinoma or another recognised biphasic neoplasm. The framework offers a falsifiable approach to refining tumour characterisation without prematurely modifying classification or clinical management.

Preprints.org
Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon