The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Institutional Stress Test: University Management in Four Latin American Countries

The COVID-19 pandemic required universities to reorganize teaching and student services when campus access was restricted. This exploratory study examines whether reported university management practices were associated with enrollment change. University leaders in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela completed a survey between November 2021 and January 2022, rating eight management domains before and during the pandemic. Descriptive analyses included 105 institutional survey records. Enrollment analyses used 74 institutions in Colombia and Ecuador with usable student counts for 2019 and 2023. Separate regression models examined each pre-pandemic management domain, accounting for baseline institutional size, country, and perceived risks. Additional analyses examined relative enrollment change and compared institutions with different levels of reported management implementation during the pandemic. Enrollment increased by an average of 2935 students, although the median increase was considerably smaller, at 328 students. None of the eight management domains showed a statistically significant association with enrollment change after adjustment. Differences across implementation categories were also not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. These findings did not establish a clear association between the measured management practices and enrollment change in this sample. Retrospective reporting and limited information on institutional circumstances constrain interpretation. The study contributes evidence on university management in a region where institutional data remain scarce. Prospective research should examine how specific practices relate to student retention, progression, and access to services, which would provide a more direct basis for assessing educational continuity during future disruptions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
COVID
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/covid6110190
Primary Topic
Education during COVID-19 pandemic
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Institutional Stress Test: University Management in Four Latin American Countries

Marco Faytong‐Haro, Giancarlo Daniel Salazar Olaya, Carlos Alberto Freire-Cadme, José Alberto Díaz Montenegro et al.
1 links
COVID
Education during COVID-19 pandemic
article

The COVID-19 Pandemic as an Institutional Stress Test: University Management in Four Latin American Countries

Marco Faytong‐Haro, Giancarlo Daniel Salazar Olaya, Carlos Alberto Freire-Cadme, José Alberto Díaz Montenegro, Whashington Guevara Piedra, Alexis Contreras-Falcones, Byron Zambrano-Rivas, María Soledad Castello-Touma, Washington Olivo Guevara Macías, Oswaldo Patiño-Vega
article en

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic required universities to reorganize teaching and student services when campus access was restricted. This exploratory study examines whether reported university management practices were associated with enrollment change. University leaders in Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela completed a survey between November 2021 and January 2022, rating eight management domains before and during the pandemic. Descriptive analyses included 105 institutional survey records. Enrollment analyses used 74 institutions in Colombia and Ecuador with usable student counts for 2019 and 2023. Separate regression models examined each pre-pandemic management domain, accounting for baseline institutional size, country, and perceived risks. Additional analyses examined relative enrollment change and compared institutions with different levels of reported management implementation during the pandemic. Enrollment increased by an average of 2935 students, although the median increase was considerably smaller, at 328 students. None of the eight management domains showed a statistically significant association with enrollment change after adjustment. Differences across implementation categories were also not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. These findings did not establish a clear association between the measured management practices and enrollment change in this sample. Retrospective reporting and limited information on institutional circumstances constrain interpretation. The study contributes evidence on university management in a region where institutional data remain scarce. Prospective research should examine how specific practices relate to student retention, progression, and access to services, which would provide a more direct basis for assessing educational continuity during future disruptions.

COVIDVol. 6(11)
Pennsylvania State University (US), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Universidad Espíritu Santo (EC), Universidad Estatal de Milagro (EC), Universidad Ecotec (EC)
Junta de Castilla y León, European Regional Development Fund
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Education during COVID-19 pandemic
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon