English teachers' readiness, perceptions and use of AI tools in resource-constrained public high schools of Sindh, Pakistan

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools reach teachers through free smartphone applications, yet evidence on whether English teachers in under-resourced government schools of Pakistan are ready to use them remains thin. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), AI-TPACK and self-efficacy, this study examined High School English teachers' perceptions, readiness and frequency of AI use, and the contextual conditions that shape them in Sindh. An exploratory cross-sectional survey was completed by 64 English teachers from 13 districts, recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. The instrument measured perceptions, four readiness components (AI literacy, AI pedagogical competence, self-efficacy and ethical awareness); institutional support; and resource challenges (α = .77–.95). Data were analysed using correlations, multiple regression, group comparisons, and thematic coding of open-ended responses. Teachers reported high readiness (M = 3.88), rated lowest institutional support (M = 2.99); only 20.3% had received AI training, and 85.9% relied on personal smartphones. Perceptions, benefits, institutional support and challenges together explained 62% of the variance in overall readiness. However, AI pedagogical competence was predicted by AI literacy (β = .41) and self-efficacy (β = .36), not by favourable perceptions (ΔR² = .27, R² = .64). Frequency of AI use was linked to perceptions (r = .48– .49) but not to competence or self-efficacy. Urban teachers use AI more often than rural teachers (d = 0.53; p = .054), though readiness did not differ. Acceptance drives use, whereas literacy and confidence drive the ability to teach with AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Journal of Human and Social Aspects
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71085/rjhsa.04.04.157
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

English teachers' readiness, perceptions and use of AI tools in resource-constrained public high schools of Sindh, Pakistan

Azhar Ali Ghumro, Mohsin Ali Ghumro, Sumbul Khalid
3 links
Research Journal of Human and Social Aspects
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

English teachers' readiness, perceptions and use of AI tools in resource-constrained public high schools of Sindh, Pakistan

Azhar Ali Ghumro, Mohsin Ali Ghumro, Sumbul Khalid
article en

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools reach teachers through free smartphone applications, yet evidence on whether English teachers in under-resourced government schools of Pakistan are ready to use them remains thin. Drawing on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), AI-TPACK and self-efficacy, this study examined High School English teachers' perceptions, readiness and frequency of AI use, and the contextual conditions that shape them in Sindh. An exploratory cross-sectional survey was completed by 64 English teachers from 13 districts, recruited through convenience and snowball sampling. The instrument measured perceptions, four readiness components (AI literacy, AI pedagogical competence, self-efficacy and ethical awareness); institutional support; and resource challenges (α = .77–.95). Data were analysed using correlations, multiple regression, group comparisons, and thematic coding of open-ended responses. Teachers reported high readiness (M = 3.88), rated lowest institutional support (M = 2.99); only 20.3% had received AI training, and 85.9% relied on personal smartphones. Perceptions, benefits, institutional support and challenges together explained 62% of the variance in overall readiness. However, AI pedagogical competence was predicted by AI literacy (β = .41) and self-efficacy (β = .36), not by favourable perceptions (ΔR² = .27, R² = .64). Frequency of AI use was linked to perceptions (r = .48– .49) but not to competence or self-efficacy. Urban teachers use AI more often than rural teachers (d = 0.53; p = .054), though readiness did not differ. Acceptance drives use, whereas literacy and confidence drive the ability to teach with AI.

Research Journal of Human and Social AspectsVol. 4(4)
University of Sindh (PK), Sukkur IBA University (PK)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon