Cognitive Mechanisms of Literary Meaning-Making and the Constructive Reader

This article examines the cognitive mechanisms by which literary texts generate meaning, and the role of the reader in stabilising that meaning into concepts. Four strands that are usually theorised separately — imagination, schema theory, conceptual metaphor, and frame-and-script semantics — are integrated here with reception-oriented accounts of interpretation and reading strategy, yielding a single four-level model of literary processing. Within this model, imagination is understood as constrained offline simulation; schemata supply its generic constraints; frames and scripts provide its situational defaults; and metaphor and blending constitute its combinatorial operations. Rather than an undifferentiated act of construction, the reader's contribution is specified as a determinate inventory of strategies. The model is then applied to C. S. Lewis's The Chronicles of Narnia (1950–1956), a corpus constructed almost entirely from the systematic disruption of default knowledge structures. The analysis identifies three recurring operations — schema preservation, accretion, and disruption followed by accommodation — and demonstrates that each places a distinctive inferential demand on the reader. Two further arguments are advanced: that Lewis's distinction between receiving and using a literary work restates Piaget's contrast between accommodation and assimilation, and that his defence of supposal over allegory is better described by blending theory than by any theory of mapping. The article concludes that interpretation is not a supplement to textual meaning but the very mechanism through which textual cues become concepts.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70413/ln-v01-i01-a9082
Primary Topic
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cognitive Mechanisms of Literary Meaning-Making and the Constructive Reader

Nozima Akhrorovna Saidova
1 links
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
article

Cognitive Mechanisms of Literary Meaning-Making and the Constructive Reader

Nozima Akhrorovna Saidova
article en

Abstract

This article examines the cognitive mechanisms by which literary texts generate meaning, and the role of the reader in stabilising that meaning into concepts. Four strands that are usually theorised separately — imagination, schema theory, conceptual metaphor, and frame-and-script semantics — are integrated here with reception-oriented accounts of interpretation and reading strategy, yielding a single four-level model of literary processing. Within this model, imagination is understood as constrained offline simulation; schemata supply its generic constraints; frames and scripts provide its situational defaults; and metaphor and blending constitute its combinatorial operations. Rather than an undifferentiated act of construction, the reader's contribution is specified as a determinate inventory of strategies. The model is then applied to C. S. Lewis's The Chronicles of Narnia (1950–1956), a corpus constructed almost entirely from the systematic disruption of default knowledge structures. The analysis identifies three recurring operations — schema preservation, accretion, and disruption followed by accommodation — and demonstrates that each places a distinctive inferential demand on the reader. Two further arguments are advanced: that Lewis's distinction between receiving and using a literary work restates Piaget's contrast between accommodation and assimilation, and that his defence of supposal over allegory is better described by blending theory than by any theory of mapping. The article concludes that interpretation is not a supplement to textual meaning but the very mechanism through which textual cues become concepts.

Vol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon