THE PHOTON REINTERPRETED: PULSE, CYCLE, AND EMISSION

The concept of the photon, central to quantum physics, remains ontologically ambiguous. It is defined operationally — by what it does — and not by what it is. Building on the model of light as a sequence of alternating charges (Flor, 2026n), this article proposes a decomposition of the concept into three distinct notions: the fundamental photon (a complete cycle of two pulses, one positive and one negative, separated by half a wavelength), the atomic photon (the set of cycles emitted by an atom in a given transition), and the continuous photon (the set of cycles emitted by a source over a time interval). A fourth notion, that of the half-photon (an isolated pulse), is introduced to clarify why an isolated pulse does not define a frequency. In this view, the Planck relation E=h.ν does not refer to the energy of a cycle, but to the energy of the atomic photon — which is what is experimentally measured. The energy of the atomic photon is distributed equally among the N cycles that compose it, and is proportional simultaneously to the frequency (number of sub-particles per unit time) and to the number of cycles (duration of emission). The Planck constant emerges as a constant of proportionality between the number of pulses in the atomic photon and the mass and energy of each sub-particle. With this reclassification, the model eliminates four fundamental constants of physics: h is added to c, ε0, and μ0, already eliminated in the article on the implicit medium (Flor, 2026l). The article further proposes that the photon has a diminutive rest mass, and develops here itself the qualitative reinterpretation of the experiments that indicate zero mass as measurements of the wave effect (interaction), not of the sub-particles themselves. The complete reinterpretation of E=m.c2 — as the maximum amount of energy per unit of mass — is referred to the article on mass and energy. Nothing prevents the energy of the photon from being kinetic and therefore on the order of m.c2/2. For light, the de Broglie relation λ=h/p follows immediately from p=E/c. For massive particles, the de Broglie relation is explicitly left as an open problem, to be treated in a future article. The photoelectric effect and the other interactions between light and matter are likewise referred to the article on light-matter interactions. The reinterpretation of single-photon experiments is discussed in this article.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23692066
Primary Topic
Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE PHOTON REINTERPRETED: PULSE, CYCLE, AND EMISSION

Ricardo de la Flor
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
article

THE PHOTON REINTERPRETED: PULSE, CYCLE, AND EMISSION

Ricardo de la Flor
article en

Abstract

The concept of the photon, central to quantum physics, remains ontologically ambiguous. It is defined operationally — by what it does — and not by what it is. Building on the model of light as a sequence of alternating charges (Flor, 2026n), this article proposes a decomposition of the concept into three distinct notions: the fundamental photon (a complete cycle of two pulses, one positive and one negative, separated by half a wavelength), the atomic photon (the set of cycles emitted by an atom in a given transition), and the continuous photon (the set of cycles emitted by a source over a time interval). A fourth notion, that of the half-photon (an isolated pulse), is introduced to clarify why an isolated pulse does not define a frequency. In this view, the Planck relation E=h.ν does not refer to the energy of a cycle, but to the energy of the atomic photon — which is what is experimentally measured. The energy of the atomic photon is distributed equally among the N cycles that compose it, and is proportional simultaneously to the frequency (number of sub-particles per unit time) and to the number of cycles (duration of emission). The Planck constant emerges as a constant of proportionality between the number of pulses in the atomic photon and the mass and energy of each sub-particle. With this reclassification, the model eliminates four fundamental constants of physics: h is added to c, ε0, and μ0, already eliminated in the article on the implicit medium (Flor, 2026l). The article further proposes that the photon has a diminutive rest mass, and develops here itself the qualitative reinterpretation of the experiments that indicate zero mass as measurements of the wave effect (interaction), not of the sub-particles themselves. The complete reinterpretation of E=m.c2 — as the maximum amount of energy per unit of mass — is referred to the article on mass and energy. Nothing prevents the energy of the photon from being kinetic and therefore on the order of m.c2/2. For light, the de Broglie relation λ=h/p follows immediately from p=E/c. For massive particles, the de Broglie relation is explicitly left as an open problem, to be treated in a future article. The photoelectric effect and the other interactions between light and matter are likewise referred to the article on light-matter interactions. The reinterpretation of single-photon experiments is discussed in this article.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
THE PHOTON REINTERPRETED: PULSE, CYCLE, AND EMISSION — Ricardo de la Flor · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS