Recipient contributions to primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the leading cause of early mortality post heart transplantation (HT). Across several international and national registries, the incidence of PGD has continued to increase. The mechanistic contributions of donor and procedural insults, namely brain or circulatory death, ischemic exposure, and ischemia-reperfusion injury, have been consistently emphasized across various reports. As the surgical techniques and procurement strategies within the current era of HT continue to improve, the net of recipients broadens and includes more high-risk, frail, and comorbid patients. This review therefore aims to explore the recipient contributions of PGD across four domains: hemodynamics and use of mechanical circulatory support, preoperative medical therapy, end-organ dysfunction, and recipient-driven operative characteristics. For each domain, we describe its incidence, the predictor's underlying mechanism, and its contribution to the recipient's biology. Durable LVAD support, pre-transplant ECMO, amiodarone exposure, renal dysfunction, and prior sternotomy emerge as consistently reported independent predictors of PGD, whereas findings for temporary VAD and IABP remain inconsistent. These exposures provide distinct pathways to generate a hostile recipient environment characterized by a primed innate immune system, systemic inflammation, hemodynamic burden, vasomotor dysfunction, multi-organ dysfunction, and operative burden. However, no interventional study has yet to examine the effect of modifying recipient risk factors on PGD development; thereby, existing evidence are derived from observational studies implying association rather than causation. Bridging the gap between recipient risk factors and biologic contributions to PGD may unveil areas for recipient optimization, ultimately improving HT outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2026.1984203
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recipient contributions to primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation

Nitish K Dhingra, Vivek Rao, Ahmed El-Hamad
2 links
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Recipient contributions to primary graft dysfunction in heart transplantation

Nitish K Dhingra, Vivek Rao, Ahmed El-Hamad
article en

Abstract

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) remains the leading cause of early mortality post heart transplantation (HT). Across several international and national registries, the incidence of PGD has continued to increase. The mechanistic contributions of donor and procedural insults, namely brain or circulatory death, ischemic exposure, and ischemia-reperfusion injury, have been consistently emphasized across various reports. As the surgical techniques and procurement strategies within the current era of HT continue to improve, the net of recipients broadens and includes more high-risk, frail, and comorbid patients. This review therefore aims to explore the recipient contributions of PGD across four domains: hemodynamics and use of mechanical circulatory support, preoperative medical therapy, end-organ dysfunction, and recipient-driven operative characteristics. For each domain, we describe its incidence, the predictor's underlying mechanism, and its contribution to the recipient's biology. Durable LVAD support, pre-transplant ECMO, amiodarone exposure, renal dysfunction, and prior sternotomy emerge as consistently reported independent predictors of PGD, whereas findings for temporary VAD and IABP remain inconsistent. These exposures provide distinct pathways to generate a hostile recipient environment characterized by a primed innate immune system, systemic inflammation, hemodynamic burden, vasomotor dysfunction, multi-organ dysfunction, and operative burden. However, no interventional study has yet to examine the effect of modifying recipient risk factors on PGD development; thereby, existing evidence are derived from observational studies implying association rather than causation. Bridging the gap between recipient risk factors and biologic contributions to PGD may unveil areas for recipient optimization, ultimately improving HT outcomes.

Frontiers in Cardiovascular MedicineVol. 13
University Health Network (CA), University of Toronto (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon