Intersection Rules Subtest Timing as a Predictor of DriveSafe DriveAware Outcomes: A Pilot Study

Importance Intersection Rules Subtest timing is a potential predictor of the DriveSafe outcome score in DriveSafe DriveAware (DSDA) assessment. Objective To examine whether Intersection Rules completion time is associated with DriveSafe outcome within the DSDA assessment. Design Retrospective, observational pilot study using secondary data. Setting Australian metropolitan fitness-to-drive clinic. Participants Of 169 participants (median age = 80; 61.5% male), 104 categorised into non-pass group of DriveSafe subtest formed ‘cases’, whilst 65 who passed were ‘controls’. Outcomes and Measures Primary predictor: Intersection Rules Subtest completion time in seconds. Primary outcome: DriveSafe subtest outcome, categorised as pass/non-pass. Relationships analysed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Longer Intersection Rules Subtest time significantly predicted lower DriveSafe subtest outcome (non-pass) scores, with each additional 60 s increasing odds of failure by 93.7% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.40, 2.68], p < .001). A ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI: [.654, .807]). An optimal cut-off of 213.5 s showed high specificity (86.2%) (95% CI: [75.3, 93.5]) but modest sensitivity (48.1%) (95% CI: [38.2, 58.1]) for a non-pass result. Conclusions and Relevance Intersection Rules Subtest completion time was associated with DriveSafe outcome in this pilot study. The current findings support future study of this timing metric, which may have potential as a clinical decision-support indicator, a ‘Detect and Pause’ step, after prospective validation and DSDA protocol sequence modification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19437676261500030
Primary Topic
Older Adults Driving Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intersection Rules Subtest Timing as a Predictor of DriveSafe DriveAware Outcomes: A Pilot Study

Lynette A. Mackenzie, B J Johnston, Carole L James, Joan O’Donnell et al.
2 links
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Older Adults Driving Studies
article

Intersection Rules Subtest Timing as a Predictor of DriveSafe DriveAware Outcomes: A Pilot Study

Lynette A. Mackenzie, B J Johnston, Carole L James, Joan O’Donnell, Hoi Lam Stephanie Wong
article en

Abstract

Importance Intersection Rules Subtest timing is a potential predictor of the DriveSafe outcome score in DriveSafe DriveAware (DSDA) assessment. Objective To examine whether Intersection Rules completion time is associated with DriveSafe outcome within the DSDA assessment. Design Retrospective, observational pilot study using secondary data. Setting Australian metropolitan fitness-to-drive clinic. Participants Of 169 participants (median age = 80; 61.5% male), 104 categorised into non-pass group of DriveSafe subtest formed ‘cases’, whilst 65 who passed were ‘controls’. Outcomes and Measures Primary predictor: Intersection Rules Subtest completion time in seconds. Primary outcome: DriveSafe subtest outcome, categorised as pass/non-pass. Relationships analysed using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results Longer Intersection Rules Subtest time significantly predicted lower DriveSafe subtest outcome (non-pass) scores, with each additional 60 s increasing odds of failure by 93.7% (odds ratio [OR] = 1.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.40, 2.68], p < .001). A ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI: [.654, .807]). An optimal cut-off of 213.5 s showed high specificity (86.2%) (95% CI: [75.3, 93.5]) but modest sensitivity (48.1%) (95% CI: [38.2, 58.1]) for a non-pass result. Conclusions and Relevance Intersection Rules Subtest completion time was associated with DriveSafe outcome in this pilot study. The current findings support future study of this timing metric, which may have potential as a clinical decision-support indicator, a ‘Detect and Pause’ step, after prospective validation and DSDA protocol sequence modification.

American Journal of Occupational Therapy
University of Technology Sydney (AU), The University of Sydney (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Older Adults Driving Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon