Explainable Interface Design for Human–AI Collaboration in Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

BACKGROUND Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) enables real-time, in vivo tissue assessment during head and neck cancer surgery, where the balance between oncological safety and functional preservation is particularly delicate. Artificial intelligence (AI) can support CLE interpretation, yet clinical adoption remains limited, a gap attributed less to model performance than to a lack of interfaces that make AI outputs interpretable and trustworthy at the point of care. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate how explanatory, user-centered interfaces can enable reliable human–AI collaboration for AI-assisted CLE across the surgical workflow. METHODS Following a user-centered design approach, a user journey map informed the development of three high-fidelity prototypes addressing intraoperative, pre-/postoperative, and educational use cases. A mixed-methods evaluation with five experienced surgeons from four institutions combined think-aloud exploration, the short User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S), and semi-structured interviews; qualitative data were analysed inductively through thematic analysis. RESULTS Explainability, conveyed through influential morphological features, class activation maps, and example-based case comparisons, anchored AI recommendations in surgeons’ established clinical reasoning and supported verification against their own judgement. Explicit communication of model uncertainty emerged as a distinct prerequisite for calibrated trust. Clarity, simplicity, and adaptive information density were identified as central design principles, while diverging preferences pointed to a need for configurable interaction modes. All three prototypes were rated as excellent on the UEQ-S (overall means 2.53–2.68). CONCLUSIONS Trustworthy integration of AI into CLE depends primarily on explanatory interfaces aligned with clinical reasoning and on transparent communication of uncertainty, rather than on model performance alone. Configurable, workflow-adaptive designs and case-based educational applications represent promising directions for clinical translation.

Authors

Publication Details

Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/preprints.115441
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Explainable Interface Design for Human–AI Collaboration in Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

Nina K. Wenda, Jan Gosepath, Ralf Kießlich, Robin Senge et al.
1 links
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
preprint

Explainable Interface Design for Human–AI Collaboration in Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy for Head and Neck Cancer Surgery: Mixed Methods Study (Preprint)

Nina K. Wenda, Jan Gosepath, Ralf Kießlich, Robin Senge, Matti Sievert, Miguel Goncalves, Stefanie Marx, Alina Döring
preprint en

Abstract

BACKGROUND Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) enables real-time, in vivo tissue assessment during head and neck cancer surgery, where the balance between oncological safety and functional preservation is particularly delicate. Artificial intelligence (AI) can support CLE interpretation, yet clinical adoption remains limited, a gap attributed less to model performance than to a lack of interfaces that make AI outputs interpretable and trustworthy at the point of care. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate how explanatory, user-centered interfaces can enable reliable human–AI collaboration for AI-assisted CLE across the surgical workflow. METHODS Following a user-centered design approach, a user journey map informed the development of three high-fidelity prototypes addressing intraoperative, pre-/postoperative, and educational use cases. A mixed-methods evaluation with five experienced surgeons from four institutions combined think-aloud exploration, the short User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S), and semi-structured interviews; qualitative data were analysed inductively through thematic analysis. RESULTS Explainability, conveyed through influential morphological features, class activation maps, and example-based case comparisons, anchored AI recommendations in surgeons’ established clinical reasoning and supported verification against their own judgement. Explicit communication of model uncertainty emerged as a distinct prerequisite for calibrated trust. Clarity, simplicity, and adaptive information density were identified as central design principles, while diverging preferences pointed to a need for configurable interaction modes. All three prototypes were rated as excellent on the UEQ-S (overall means 2.53–2.68). CONCLUSIONS Trustworthy integration of AI into CLE depends primarily on explanatory interfaces aligned with clinical reasoning and on transparent communication of uncertainty, rather than on model performance alone. Configurable, workflow-adaptive designs and case-based educational applications represent promising directions for clinical translation.

Good health and well-being
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon