Hitchcock’s Vertigo and DeepDream: Perception Across Cinema and Artificial Intelligence

This article examines the comparison between Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo and DeepDream through visual, narrative, and historical perspectives. It first considers formal affinities between DeepDream’s amplification of learned visual features and the perceptual construction of “Madeleine” in Vertigo, while stressing the functional and ontological differences between human perception and artificial neural networks. The analysis then turns to the film’s opening credits and nightmare sequence, asking how their treatment of the eye, fixation, light, and visual instability may be reconsidered in relation to contemporary research on vision. Rather than proposing any direct influence or shared genealogy, the article uses the work of William Grey Walter, David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel as a form of historical mediation. Some of this research was contemporary with Vertigo, while some would also, through substantial conceptual and technical transformations, contribute to the history of artificial visual-recognition systems. The comparison thus provides a way to historicize certain affinities between Vertigo and DeepDream while also clarifying the limits of their correspondence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Arts
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/arts15110246
Primary Topic
Cinema History and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hitchcock’s Vertigo and DeepDream: Perception Across Cinema and Artificial Intelligence

Stéphane Eckert-Fuchs
1 links
Arts
Cinema History and Criticism
article

Hitchcock’s Vertigo and DeepDream: Perception Across Cinema and Artificial Intelligence

Stéphane Eckert-Fuchs
article en

Abstract

This article examines the comparison between Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo and DeepDream through visual, narrative, and historical perspectives. It first considers formal affinities between DeepDream’s amplification of learned visual features and the perceptual construction of “Madeleine” in Vertigo, while stressing the functional and ontological differences between human perception and artificial neural networks. The analysis then turns to the film’s opening credits and nightmare sequence, asking how their treatment of the eye, fixation, light, and visual instability may be reconsidered in relation to contemporary research on vision. Rather than proposing any direct influence or shared genealogy, the article uses the work of William Grey Walter, David Hubel and Torsten Wiesel as a form of historical mediation. Some of this research was contemporary with Vertigo, while some would also, through substantial conceptual and technical transformations, contribute to the history of artificial visual-recognition systems. The comparison thus provides a way to historicize certain affinities between Vertigo and DeepDream while also clarifying the limits of their correspondence.

ArtsVol. 15(11)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Aix-Marseille Université (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cinema History and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon