Weldability of Additively Manufactured Austenitic Stainless Steels

Additive manufacturing (AM) can enable faster, lower-cost production of power generation components. However, implementation of AM parts into service requires welding to other components, and the weldability of AM alloys is not well characterized. On-cooling hot ductility testing was performed between 1000°C and 1300°C on gas metal arc directed energy deposition (GMADED), laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), and wrought 316-series stainless steels to evaluate weldability and ductility dip cracking (DDC) susceptibility of AM austenitic stainless steels. The results were analyzed with respect to variations in dynamic recrystallization, absorbed energy, and fracture mechanism. Single and multipass autogenous gas tungsten arc welds were performed on GMADED, L-PBF, and wrought plates to correlate hot ductility behavior with DDC susceptibility in welded specimens. GMA-DED 316(L/H/LSi) exhibited good hot ductility regardless of post-build heat treatment, while L-PBF 316L exhibited reduced ductility across all conditions. L-PBF 316L also exhibited lower absorbed energy, which correlated with reduced hot ductility and intergranular fracture, whereas the GMA-DED and wrought conditions exhibited greater absorbed energy and ductile fracture. The reduced weldability of L-PBF 316L is suggested to be associated with grain boundary embrittlement from impurity elements segregation during primary austenite solidification. Heat-affected zone microcracking was observed in the GTAW welds of L-PBF 316L, confirming susceptibility to DDC and supporting the correlation between reduced hot ductility and weldability issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Welding Journal
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29391/2026.105.024
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Weldability of Additively Manufactured Austenitic Stainless Steels

Stephen Tate, Jonah Klemm-Toole, American Welding Society, OLIVIA DENONNO et al.
Welding Journal
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Weldability of Additively Manufactured Austenitic Stainless Steels

Stephen Tate, Jonah Klemm-Toole, American Welding Society, OLIVIA DENONNO, ROBERT HAMLIN
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) can enable faster, lower-cost production of power generation components. However, implementation of AM parts into service requires welding to other components, and the weldability of AM alloys is not well characterized. On-cooling hot ductility testing was performed between 1000°C and 1300°C on gas metal arc directed energy deposition (GMADED), laser powder bed fusion (L-PBF), and wrought 316-series stainless steels to evaluate weldability and ductility dip cracking (DDC) susceptibility of AM austenitic stainless steels. The results were analyzed with respect to variations in dynamic recrystallization, absorbed energy, and fracture mechanism. Single and multipass autogenous gas tungsten arc welds were performed on GMADED, L-PBF, and wrought plates to correlate hot ductility behavior with DDC susceptibility in welded specimens. GMA-DED 316(L/H/LSi) exhibited good hot ductility regardless of post-build heat treatment, while L-PBF 316L exhibited reduced ductility across all conditions. L-PBF 316L also exhibited lower absorbed energy, which correlated with reduced hot ductility and intergranular fracture, whereas the GMA-DED and wrought conditions exhibited greater absorbed energy and ductile fracture. The reduced weldability of L-PBF 316L is suggested to be associated with grain boundary embrittlement from impurity elements segregation during primary austenite solidification. Heat-affected zone microcracking was observed in the GTAW welds of L-PBF 316L, confirming susceptibility to DDC and supporting the correlation between reduced hot ductility and weldability issues.

Welding JournalVol. 105(024)
Colorado School of Mines (US), Naval Nuclear Laboratory (US)
National Science Foundation, Division of Materials Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon