Measurement error adjusted prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension in England: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Hypertension case-finding and management is key to reducing premature morbidity and mortality. In England, 14.8% of people receive treatment for hypertension but the total number of hypertensive individuals remains unclear, as it can only be estimated statistically. This study aimed to estimate how many individuals aged 40 + may unknowingly have hypertension by accounting for differences between clinic and out-of-office blood pressure readings. METHODS: We analysed individual-level data from the 2017-2019 Health Survey for England (HSE), including individuals aged ≥40 without a hypertension diagnosis. A validated algorithm (Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure- PROOF-BP) was applied to estimate likely out-of-office measurements. Observed BP was defined as the mean of the second and third measurement taken at an HSE visit. Predicted hypertension was calculated using PROOF-BP and observed hypertension using actual clinic measurements. We explored a diagnostic threshold for predicted (out-of-office) hypertension of ≥135/85 mmHg (primary outcome) and of ≥140/90 mmHg (secondary outcome). Weighted hypertension prevalence estimates are presented by age, sex and geographical region. National population statistics were used to extrapolate results to the English population. RESULTS: The observed prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension in the study population was 27.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]:26.4%-29.1%). The predicted prevalence after adjustment was 21.8% (95%CI:20.6%-23.0%). Predicted prevalence was nearly double in males (29.8%, 95%CI:27.8%-32.0%) compared to females (14.6%, 95%CI:13.3%-15.9%) and varied by region: West Midlands (26.3%, 95%CI:22.2%-31.0%), London (16.9%, 95%CI:13.5%-20.9%). Extrapolating estimates to the total population aged ≥40 in England we estimate approximately 4.2 million people in England are unaware of their hypertension. Of these we estimate that over 2.9 million could be newly diagnosed by the current diagnostic pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Over 4 million people in England are estimated to have undiagnosed hypertension. This study's refined analytical approach provides a more precise estimate of this population, supporting targeted public health initiatives to identify and address undiagnosed cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0359861
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measurement error adjusted prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension in England: A cross-sectional study

Richard Stevens, Alejandra Castañón, James Peter Sheppard, Jonathan Pearson‐Stuttard et al.
1 links
PLoS ONE
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

Measurement error adjusted prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension in England: A cross-sectional study

Richard Stevens, Alejandra Castañón, James Peter Sheppard, Jonathan Pearson‐Stuttard, Katja Grašič, Richard J. McManus, Martin White, Andrew Hughes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hypertension case-finding and management is key to reducing premature morbidity and mortality. In England, 14.8% of people receive treatment for hypertension but the total number of hypertensive individuals remains unclear, as it can only be estimated statistically. This study aimed to estimate how many individuals aged 40 + may unknowingly have hypertension by accounting for differences between clinic and out-of-office blood pressure readings. METHODS: We analysed individual-level data from the 2017-2019 Health Survey for England (HSE), including individuals aged ≥40 without a hypertension diagnosis. A validated algorithm (Predicting Out-of-Office Blood Pressure- PROOF-BP) was applied to estimate likely out-of-office measurements. Observed BP was defined as the mean of the second and third measurement taken at an HSE visit. Predicted hypertension was calculated using PROOF-BP and observed hypertension using actual clinic measurements. We explored a diagnostic threshold for predicted (out-of-office) hypertension of ≥135/85 mmHg (primary outcome) and of ≥140/90 mmHg (secondary outcome). Weighted hypertension prevalence estimates are presented by age, sex and geographical region. National population statistics were used to extrapolate results to the English population. RESULTS: The observed prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension in the study population was 27.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]:26.4%-29.1%). The predicted prevalence after adjustment was 21.8% (95%CI:20.6%-23.0%). Predicted prevalence was nearly double in males (29.8%, 95%CI:27.8%-32.0%) compared to females (14.6%, 95%CI:13.3%-15.9%) and varied by region: West Midlands (26.3%, 95%CI:22.2%-31.0%), London (16.9%, 95%CI:13.5%-20.9%). Extrapolating estimates to the total population aged ≥40 in England we estimate approximately 4.2 million people in England are unaware of their hypertension. Of these we estimate that over 2.9 million could be newly diagnosed by the current diagnostic pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Over 4 million people in England are estimated to have undiagnosed hypertension. This study's refined analytical approach provides a more precise estimate of this population, supporting targeted public health initiatives to identify and address undiagnosed cases.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
University of Sussex (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (GB), University of Brighton (GB)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, British Heart Foundation, Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon