Longitudinal psychosocial burden, quality of life, and digital supportive care preferences before and after CAR T-cell therapy: a prospective single-center observational study

Abstract Background Prospective studies of CAR T-cell therapy have described changes in patient-reported outcomes, but these are rarely examined alongside supportive care preferences and patients’ own accounts. We examined these components together across the treatment course. Methods This prospective single-center study included adults scheduled for CAR T-cell therapy at a German tertiary hospital. Of 52 patients in the screening/recruitment log, 32 who completed at least three of four assessments formed the longitudinal cohort. Assessments occurred before treatment (T0), during post-infusion hospitalization (T1), at or around discharge (T2), and seven to eight weeks after discharge (T3). Standardized measures assessed quality of life, anxiety/depression, loneliness, fear of progression, somatic symptoms, and social support. Unadjusted generalized estimating equations examined longitudinal change; supportive care items were summarized descriptively and open-ended responses analyzed thematically. Results The cohort included 17 male and 15 female participants; median age was 61.0 years (IQR 53.0-65.5), and 23/32 (71.9%) had multiple myeloma. Global health status/quality of life showed an overall time effect (p = 0.001), with the lowest mean at T2 and recovery by T3. Physical functioning was nominally lower at T2 (β = -14.450, p = 0.046); fatigue was nominally higher at T1 and T2 (β = 11.990, p = 0.015; β = 15.574, p = 0.008), and the QLQ-C30 summary score lower at T1 and T2 (β = -7.772, p = 0.006; β = -6.954, p = 0.035). Loneliness was nominally higher at T1 (β = 0.795, p = 0.009), whereas PHQ-4 scores changed little. Across timepoints, 60.0% to 70.0% considered post-discharge psycho-oncological support useful and 66.7% to 79.3% considered peer contact useful. Five themes concerned treatment uncertainty, physical decline, multidimensional support needs, accessible individualized digital support, and incomplete treatment understanding. Conclusions Patient-reported physical and functional burden was greatest during hospitalization and around discharge and improved by seven to eight weeks after discharge. Brief anxiety/depression scores captured only part of participants’ support needs. The findings can inform co-design and prospective evaluation of longitudinal supportive care approaches without establishing intervention effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-17245-y
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Longitudinal psychosocial burden, quality of life, and digital supportive care preferences before and after CAR T-cell therapy: a prospective single-center observational study

Anna Fleischer, Imad Maatouk, Florian Eisele, Elisabeth Jentschke et al.
2 links
BMC Cancer
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Longitudinal psychosocial burden, quality of life, and digital supportive care preferences before and after CAR T-cell therapy: a prospective single-center observational study

Anna Fleischer, Imad Maatouk, Florian Eisele, Elisabeth Jentschke, Patrick‐Pascal Strunz, Michael Hudecek, Yoko Tamamushi, Barbara Huber, Hermann Einsele, Leo RASCHE, Nadine Schassberger, Sabine-Anna Bergert, Miriam Benz, Max Topp, Johannes Duell
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prospective studies of CAR T-cell therapy have described changes in patient-reported outcomes, but these are rarely examined alongside supportive care preferences and patients’ own accounts. We examined these components together across the treatment course. Methods This prospective single-center study included adults scheduled for CAR T-cell therapy at a German tertiary hospital. Of 52 patients in the screening/recruitment log, 32 who completed at least three of four assessments formed the longitudinal cohort. Assessments occurred before treatment (T0), during post-infusion hospitalization (T1), at or around discharge (T2), and seven to eight weeks after discharge (T3). Standardized measures assessed quality of life, anxiety/depression, loneliness, fear of progression, somatic symptoms, and social support. Unadjusted generalized estimating equations examined longitudinal change; supportive care items were summarized descriptively and open-ended responses analyzed thematically. Results The cohort included 17 male and 15 female participants; median age was 61.0 years (IQR 53.0-65.5), and 23/32 (71.9%) had multiple myeloma. Global health status/quality of life showed an overall time effect (p = 0.001), with the lowest mean at T2 and recovery by T3. Physical functioning was nominally lower at T2 (β = -14.450, p = 0.046); fatigue was nominally higher at T1 and T2 (β = 11.990, p = 0.015; β = 15.574, p = 0.008), and the QLQ-C30 summary score lower at T1 and T2 (β = -7.772, p = 0.006; β = -6.954, p = 0.035). Loneliness was nominally higher at T1 (β = 0.795, p = 0.009), whereas PHQ-4 scores changed little. Across timepoints, 60.0% to 70.0% considered post-discharge psycho-oncological support useful and 66.7% to 79.3% considered peer contact useful. Five themes concerned treatment uncertainty, physical decline, multidimensional support needs, accessible individualized digital support, and incomplete treatment understanding. Conclusions Patient-reported physical and functional burden was greatest during hospitalization and around discharge and improved by seven to eight weeks after discharge. Brief anxiety/depression scores captured only part of participants’ support needs. The findings can inform co-design and prospective evaluation of longitudinal supportive care approaches without establishing intervention effectiveness.

BMC Cancer
University of Würzburg (DE), Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon