Perspective-taking training with AI-generated virtual patients for primary care clinicians to enhance care for black patients with chronic pain: a pilot feasibility and acceptability study

Chronic non-cancer pain disproportionately impacts Black adults in the USA. Primary care clinicians (PCCs) receive limited training in empathy and perspective-taking, likely contributing to treatment disparities. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a novel virtual training, featuring AI-generated patient videos, designed to improve PCCs' perspective-taking skills and reduce treatment disparities. We recruited PCCs from two health systems in the Midwestern US. The training included a didactic module on pain disparities and perspective-taking, delivered by an AI-generated Black "peer" clinician, along with videos of photorealistic digital Black patients sharing their experiences living with chronic pain. PCCs practiced perspective-taking via a typed-response interface. Feasibility was assessed using time-on-task and completion rates; acceptability via system usability scores and written feedback. Using electronic health records data, we conducted an exploratory patient-level analysis comparing pain medication prescribing (three months before versus after the intervention date) for Black versus non-Black patients of intervention PCCs against a control group of 19 high-prescribing PCCs from the same health systems who did not complete the training. Logistic regression models estimated overall pain prescribing changes and initiation of new medications across nine drug classes. Fifteen PCCs (5 from health system #1; 10 from health system #2) completed the training between December 2024 and February 2025. The training proved feasible and acceptable: average completion time was approximately 6 min, and 73.3% would recommend it. Exploratory analyses included 1,991 patients (628 intervention; 1,363 control). In exploratory models, intervention patients had lower odds of a change in pain drug class than controls (odds ratio (OR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.79). An intervention-by-race interaction was observed for new opioid prescriptions (OR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.02–0.78), indicating that the association between the intervention and new opioid initiation differed for Black versus non-Black patients. Clinician-facing virtual perspective-taking training with AI-generated virtual patients is feasible and acceptable within primary care workflows. Exploratory prescribing estimates are hypothesis-generating and support progression to a fully powered cluster-randomized trial of the training's impact on prescribing equity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-026-01949-w
Primary Topic
Empathy and Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspective-taking training with AI-generated virtual patients for primary care clinicians to enhance care for black patients with chronic pain: a pilot feasibility and acceptability study

Roshan Venkatakrishnan, Benjamin Chak Lum Lok, Olena Mazurenko, Rashi Ghosh et al.
4 links
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Empathy and Medical Education
article

Perspective-taking training with AI-generated virtual patients for primary care clinicians to enhance care for black patients with chronic pain: a pilot feasibility and acceptability study

Roshan Venkatakrishnan, Benjamin Chak Lum Lok, Olena Mazurenko, Rashi Ghosh, Adam Todd Hirsh, Leigh Anne Tang, Emma McCord, Danish Tamboli
article en

Abstract

Chronic non-cancer pain disproportionately impacts Black adults in the USA. Primary care clinicians (PCCs) receive limited training in empathy and perspective-taking, likely contributing to treatment disparities. We assessed the feasibility and acceptability of a novel virtual training, featuring AI-generated patient videos, designed to improve PCCs' perspective-taking skills and reduce treatment disparities. We recruited PCCs from two health systems in the Midwestern US. The training included a didactic module on pain disparities and perspective-taking, delivered by an AI-generated Black "peer" clinician, along with videos of photorealistic digital Black patients sharing their experiences living with chronic pain. PCCs practiced perspective-taking via a typed-response interface. Feasibility was assessed using time-on-task and completion rates; acceptability via system usability scores and written feedback. Using electronic health records data, we conducted an exploratory patient-level analysis comparing pain medication prescribing (three months before versus after the intervention date) for Black versus non-Black patients of intervention PCCs against a control group of 19 high-prescribing PCCs from the same health systems who did not complete the training. Logistic regression models estimated overall pain prescribing changes and initiation of new medications across nine drug classes. Fifteen PCCs (5 from health system #1; 10 from health system #2) completed the training between December 2024 and February 2025. The training proved feasible and acceptable: average completion time was approximately 6 min, and 73.3% would recommend it. Exploratory analyses included 1,991 patients (628 intervention; 1,363 control). In exploratory models, intervention patients had lower odds of a change in pain drug class than controls (odds ratio (OR) = 0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.79). An intervention-by-race interaction was observed for new opioid prescriptions (OR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.02–0.78), indicating that the association between the intervention and new opioid initiation differed for Black versus non-Black patients. Clinician-facing virtual perspective-taking training with AI-generated virtual patients is feasible and acceptable within primary care workflows. Exploratory prescribing estimates are hypothesis-generating and support progression to a fully powered cluster-randomized trial of the training's impact on prescribing equity.

Pilot and Feasibility Studies
University of Central Florida (US), Regenstrief Institute (US), University of Florida (US), Richard M. Fairbanks Foundation (US), Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Empathy and Medical Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon