Comparison Between Concentric-Only and Eccentric-Concentric Load-Velocity Relationships and its Derived Parameters in the Jump Squat and Bench Press Throw Exercises

ABSTRACT: Hernandez-Davo, JL, Sabido, R, Asencio, P, and Boullosa, D. Comparison between concentric-only and eccentric-concentric load-velocity relationships and its derived parameters in the jump squat and bench press throw exercises. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The aim of this study was to analyze 2 different load-velocity (L-V) assessment protocols (concentric-only [CON] vs. maximal intended eccentric velocity [MAX]) on the L-V relationship in jump-squat (JS) and bench press throw (BPT) exercises, 18 men performed the L-V relationship assessments with loads representing 20, 40, 60, and 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM) on 2 different days. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV%). The mean propulsive velocity (MPV) was used to establish individual L-V profiles, their derived parameters (L0 and V0), and estimated 1RM values in back-squat and bench press exercises. Maximal intended eccentric velocity condition showed high reliability (ICC: 0.70-0.87: CV: 4.2-11.2%), whereas CON condition showed moderate-to-high scores (ICC: 0.61-0.86; CV: 4.8-10.4%). The mean propulsive velocity values were significantly higher in the MAX condition at all loads in the JS (8.9-10.9%) and at all loads except the 20% 1RM in the BPT exercise (6.1-23.3%). When using the MAX condition, L0 values were higher in the BPT exercise (5%), and V0 was greater in both the JS (9.0%) and BPT exercises (3.4%). The estimated 1RM value was higher in the MAX condition for both the squat (124.1 vs. 117.8 kg) and the bench press exercises (89.2 vs. 83.9 kg). High-velocity eccentric actions led to significantly higher MPV values, without compromising reliability values. The L-V profile and their derived parameters are substantially affected by eccentric velocity instructions. Standardized protocols using maximal eccentric velocities are suitable to assess athletes' maximal neuromuscular performances with reliable L-V profiles, which may complement the information obtained through the habitual CON protocol.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2026-10-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000005731
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between Concentric-Only and Eccentric-Concentric Load-Velocity Relationships and its Derived Parameters in the Jump Squat and Bench Press Throw Exercises

Daniel Alexandre Boullosa, Pablo Asencio, Jose Luis Hernández‐Davó, Rafael Sabido
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison Between Concentric-Only and Eccentric-Concentric Load-Velocity Relationships and its Derived Parameters in the Jump Squat and Bench Press Throw Exercises

Daniel Alexandre Boullosa, Pablo Asencio, Jose Luis Hernández‐Davó, Rafael Sabido
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Hernandez-Davo, JL, Sabido, R, Asencio, P, and Boullosa, D. Comparison between concentric-only and eccentric-concentric load-velocity relationships and its derived parameters in the jump squat and bench press throw exercises. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-The aim of this study was to analyze 2 different load-velocity (L-V) assessment protocols (concentric-only [CON] vs. maximal intended eccentric velocity [MAX]) on the L-V relationship in jump-squat (JS) and bench press throw (BPT) exercises, 18 men performed the L-V relationship assessments with loads representing 20, 40, 60, and 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM) on 2 different days. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV%). The mean propulsive velocity (MPV) was used to establish individual L-V profiles, their derived parameters (L0 and V0), and estimated 1RM values in back-squat and bench press exercises. Maximal intended eccentric velocity condition showed high reliability (ICC: 0.70-0.87: CV: 4.2-11.2%), whereas CON condition showed moderate-to-high scores (ICC: 0.61-0.86; CV: 4.8-10.4%). The mean propulsive velocity values were significantly higher in the MAX condition at all loads in the JS (8.9-10.9%) and at all loads except the 20% 1RM in the BPT exercise (6.1-23.3%). When using the MAX condition, L0 values were higher in the BPT exercise (5%), and V0 was greater in both the JS (9.0%) and BPT exercises (3.4%). The estimated 1RM value was higher in the MAX condition for both the squat (124.1 vs. 117.8 kg) and the bench press exercises (89.2 vs. 83.9 kg). High-velocity eccentric actions led to significantly higher MPV values, without compromising reliability values. The L-V profile and their derived parameters are substantially affected by eccentric velocity instructions. Standardized protocols using maximal eccentric velocities are suitable to assess athletes' maximal neuromuscular performances with reliable L-V profiles, which may complement the information obtained through the habitual CON protocol.

The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Universidad Isabel I (ES), Universidad Tecnológica Atlántico Mediterráneo – UTAMED (ES), Universidad de León (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon