Connecting Quantum Proof Systems and Hoare Logic

Verifying quantum programs today requires specialized proof systems built on interactive theorem provers such as Rocq, Lean, Isabelle, or Why3, and even modest quantum algorithms cost substantial human effort to verify. Because quantum programs cannot be effectively checked by runtime testing, formal verification is the only viable path to correctness, making the cost of these bespoke systems the chief barrier to scalable quantum software assurance. We show that verifying a quantum program should be no harder than verifying a classical array program, a paradigm commonly used in parallel programming: the Qafny quantum proof system translates into Hoare logic with array theory completely (every Qafny proof becomes a valid Hoare triple) and soundly (a valid translated triple certifies only true quantum specifications), and we mechanize the completeness direction in Rocq. The embedding determinizes quantum proof obligations and exposes the full machinery of classical automated verifiers (e.g. Dafny and SMT-based separation logic) to quantum code, removing the need for dedicated quantum proof system infrastructure. In particular, the embedding supplies the correctness argument that the existing compilation of Qafny into Dafny lacks.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
arXiv (Cornell University)
Published
2026-10-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2610.34723
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Connecting Quantum Proof Systems and Hoare Logic

Alex Potanin, Zoukarneini Difaizi Tagba, Liyi Li
arXiv (Cornell University)
Logic, programming, and type systems
preprint

Connecting Quantum Proof Systems and Hoare Logic

Alex Potanin, Zoukarneini Difaizi Tagba, Liyi Li
preprint en

Abstract

Verifying quantum programs today requires specialized proof systems built on interactive theorem provers such as Rocq, Lean, Isabelle, or Why3, and even modest quantum algorithms cost substantial human effort to verify. Because quantum programs cannot be effectively checked by runtime testing, formal verification is the only viable path to correctness, making the cost of these bespoke systems the chief barrier to scalable quantum software assurance. We show that verifying a quantum program should be no harder than verifying a classical array program, a paradigm commonly used in parallel programming: the Qafny quantum proof system translates into Hoare logic with array theory completely (every Qafny proof becomes a valid Hoare triple) and soundly (a valid translated triple certifies only true quantum specifications), and we mechanize the completeness direction in Rocq. The embedding determinizes quantum proof obligations and exposes the full machinery of classical automated verifiers (e.g. Dafny and SMT-based separation logic) to quantum code, removing the need for dedicated quantum proof system infrastructure. In particular, the embedding supplies the correctness argument that the existing compilation of Qafny into Dafny lacks.

arXiv (Cornell University)
Logic, programming, and type systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Connecting Quantum Proof Systems and Hoare Logic — Alex Potanin, Zoukarneini Difaizi Tagba, et al. · arXiv (Cornell University) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS